Six Countries to Watch in 2017
Headlines in the coming year may be dominated by the policy outcomes of U.S. president Donald Trump’s populist rhetoric, critical elections in France and Germany that could see advances for Europe’s burgeoning right-wing movements, rising military tensions in the South China Sea, or unabated atrocities in war zones like Syria and South Sudan.
But the following six countries, which have received less attention, deserve special scrutiny as they approach turning points in their trajectory, either toward or away from democracy.
Denmark’s reputation for liberal values has been tarnished over the past year by the enactment of measures that curtail the rights of asylum seekers in the name of national security. Among them are regulations that make it easier for authorities to expel such individuals or deny them entry to the country, as well as an odious new rule that allows police to seize asylum seekers’ valuables as a means of paying for their accommodation in the country. The new laws and policies are part of a broader rise in anti-immigrant sentiment that has emboldened the extreme right and contributed to a climate of paranoia, which in turn could usher in restrictions that affect the entire population. Already the Justice Ministry and police have sent worrying signals about dramatically expanding internet surveillance and authorities’ ability to block websites.
Since taking power in 2007, President Rafael Correa and the ruling Alianza PAIS have overseen a crackdown on the political opposition, journalists, demonstrators, and nongovernmental organizations. In 2016 they added educators to the list, with the approval of one law that gives the government greater authority over financial decisions at two prominent postgraduate universities, and another move that dissolved the country’s largest teachers’ union, initiated after its leader complained of rights abuses in meetings with representatives from the International Labor Organization and the UN Human Rights Committee. But Correa is barred from running for another term in the 2017 elections, and his party’s candidate, former vice president Lenín Moreno, may struggle to deliver a convincing case for continued PAIS rule amid a contracting economy. Much will depend on whether the fragmented opposition can unite around a compromise candidate.
Children look out at the sunset over the Bamarne IDP camp in northern Iraq © Andrew McConnell/Panos for DFID
As the battle to retake territory from Islamic State (IS) militants continues, a daunting set of new challenges for the Baghdad government are emerging. In recently liberated areas, the weak and fractious government will face the task of reining in Iranian-backed Shiite militias—one of Baghdad’s most important allies in the fight against IS. The authorities will also need to care for displaced and traumatized civilians, reintegrate the Sunni minority population into the national political system, and resolve territorial disputes with the Kurds stemming from the IS conflict—all while suffering from the economic and budgetary effects of low oil prices.
Rodrigo Duterte © Prachatai (Flickr)
President Rodrigo Duterte has drawn international condemnation for his sponsorship of the extrajudicial killing of thousands of alleged drug dealers, tied to his campaign pledges to reduce crime and addiction. In response to such criticism, he has accused human rights defenders of enabling the drug problem to grow by speaking out against the extrajudicial violence. Ominously, in December, the president showed a stack of documents that listed 5,000 public officials who he claims are involved in the illegal drug trade. He has also pushed for changes to the stalled peace process with the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF) that could ultimately derail the effort, according to some analysts, in part by including a splinter group that is sharply opposed to the MILF.
Mass meeting on Jammie Plaza, University of Cape Town Upper Campus on 22 October 2015. © Tony Carr (Flickr)
Public support for the long-ruling African National Congress (ANC) has continued to wane amid corruption allegations and large student protests, raising the stakes of the next elections in 2018. The strength and integrity of South Africa’s democratic institutions will be tested as they are drawn into intraparty struggles linked to the ANC’s leadership conference in late 2017. Rival factions are already jockeying for position ahead of the conference—the outcome of which will determine the party’s 2018 presidential candidate.
President Robert Mugabe’s ruling party is coming apart at the seams as feuding politicians maneuver to succeed the aging leader, in power since 1980. In a development that rattled the political arena, the Zimbabwe National Liberation War Veterans Association—previously a key ally of the president—publicly withdrew its support for Mugabe, calling him “dictatorial.” Meanwhile, public protests have focused on issues including rampant corruption and a cash crisis that has led to the repeated delay of payments for public-sector workers and new limits on bank withdrawals. The government’s late-year move to introduce an unpopular new currency has done little to ease minds or wallets, leaving the succession battle to play out on increasingly unstable terrain.
For a full list of countries to watch in 2017, visit Freedom in the World 2017.
Analyses and recommendations offered by the authors do not necessarily reflect those of Freedom House.
The following countries may be moving toward important changes in their press freedom conditions—for better or worse—in the coming year.
After a smooth start in the early post-apartheid period, South Africa’s ruling party, the African National Congress (ANC), is increasingly afflicted by contradictions between its idealistic principles and the baser behaviors of many of its officeholders. These behaviors currently include threats to institute tighter controls over the judiciary and the ANC’s civil society critics, especially the independent media. A discernable trend toward intolerance of judicial brakes on executive power, and also toward a general aversion to any criticism of executive policies and actions, raises troubling questions about the future of democratic governance in South Africa.
There remains little time for parties like the ANC to preserve their social justice legacies from continued abuse from top party leadership.