Report Navigation

Country Reports

Freedom in the World

Freedom in the World 2018

Jordan

Profile

Scoring Key: X / Y (Z)
X = Score Received
Y = Best Possible Score
Z = Change from Previous Year

Full Methodology

Freedom Status: 
Partly Free

Freedom in the World Scores

(1=Most Free, 7=Least Free)

Quick Facts

Population: 
8,200,000
Capital: 
Amman
GDP/capita: 
$4,096
Press Freedom Status: 
Not Free
Net Freedom Status: 
Partly Free
Overview: 

Jordan is a monarchy in which the king plays a dominant role in politics and governance. The parliament’s lower house is elected, but the electoral system continues to put the opposition at a disadvantage despite recent reforms, and the chamber wields little power in practice. The media and civil society groups are hampered by restrictive laws and government pressure. The judicial system is not independent and often fails to ensure due process.

Key Developments in 2017:

  • Although the threat of terrorism persisted during the year, there were no high-profile attacks like those in 2016.
  • In August, Jordan held elections for mayors, local and municipal councils, and new councils at the governorate (provincial) level that were created under a 2015 decentralization law and have a largely advisory role.
  • Also that month, the parliament abolished a penal code provision that had allowed rapists to avoid punishment by marrying their victims.
Political Rights and Civil Liberties: 

POLITICAL RIGHTS: 12 / 40

A. ELECTORAL PROCESS: 3 / 12

A1.      Was the current head of government or other chief national authority elected through free and fair elections? 0 / 4

King Abdullah II holds broad executive powers. He appoints and dismisses the prime minister and cabinet and may dissolve the bicameral National Assembly at his discretion. The prime minister as of 2017 was Hani Mulki, a veteran former diplomat and cabinet minister who had been appointed in May 2016. Constitutional amendments adopted in 2016 empowered the king to make a number of other appointments, including the crown prince and a regent, without a royal decree countersigned by the prime minister or other cabinet ministers.

Governors and the mayor of Amman are appointed, though other mayors are elected.

A2.      Were the current national legislative representatives elected through free and fair elections? 1 / 4

Members of the upper house of the bicameral National Assembly, the 65-seat Senate, are appointed unilaterally by the king. The lower house, the House of Representatives, is elected for four-year terms, with 115 seats filled through races in 23 multimember districts and 15 reserved seats filled by the leading women candidates who failed to win district seats. Twelve of the district seats are reserved for religious and ethnic minorities.

In the September 2016 elections for the House of Representatives, the first held under a new electoral system, the opposition Islamic Action Front (IAF) participated after boycotting the last two elections. It took 10 seats in its own right, and allied groups won several more. However, as in past polls, most seats went to independents—typically tribal figures and businesspeople—who were considered loyal to the monarchy. Vote buying and other forms of manipulation remained a problem.

Elections were held in August 2017 for mayors, local and municipal councils, and 12 new governorate councils that were created under a 2015 law on decentralization. However, 15 percent of the governorate council seats are appointed, and the largely consultative councils will have no legislative authority. A quarter of the seats in the Amman municipal council are also appointed by the government. As with the parliamentary elections, independent tribal candidates won the vast majority of seats, while the IAF and its allies won a plurality of the few seats captured by party-based candidates.

A3.      Are the electoral laws and framework fair, and are they implemented impartially by the relevant election management bodies? 2 / 4

Elections are administered by the Independent Election Commission (IEC), which generally receives positive reviews from international monitors in terms of technical management, though irregularities continue to be reported. The 2016 reform to Jordan’s election law introduced multiple-vote proportional representation for parliamentary elections, replacing a single nontransferable vote system that had favored progovernment tribal elites over opposition-oriented political parties. The new law also redrew district lines to mitigate acute malapportionment that had long placed urban voters at a disadvantage and inflated the influence of the regime’s rural supporters. However, even after the changes, rural and tribal voters remained heavily overrepresented.

B. POLITICAL PLURALISM AND PARTICIPATION: 6 / 16

B1.      Do the people have the right to organize in different political parties or other competitive political groupings of their choice, and is the system free of undue obstacles to the rise and fall of these competing parties or groupings? 2 / 4

Political parties based on ethnicity, race, gender, or religion are banned in Jordan, but the main opposition party, the IAF, is tolerated. Despite recent legal reforms, the system favors tribally affiliated independents over political parties with specific ideologies and platforms, as does the patronage-based political culture. In the 2016 parliamentary elections, only 215 of 1,252 candidates ran for specific parties, according to the IEC.

B2.      Is there a realistic opportunity for the opposition to increase its support or gain power through elections? 1 / 4

The Islamist opposition holds only about 12 percent of the lower house, and the political system—including the overrepresentation of rural voters—limits the ability of any party-based opposition to make significant gains. Moreover, the constitutional authority of the monarchy means that no opposition force can win control of the executive branch by democratic means alone.

B3.      Are the people’s political choices free from domination by the military, foreign powers, religious hierarchies, economic oligarchies, or any other powerful group that is not democratically accountable? 1 / 4

While voters and candidates are generally free from overt threats or violence, they remain heavily influenced by tribal affiliations and the state-sponsored patronage networks that accompany them. Citizens’ political participation is also constrained by the fact that many important positions are appointed rather than elected.

B4.      Do various segments of the population (including ethnic, religious, gender, LGBT, and other relevant groups) have full political rights and electoral opportunities? 2 / 4

Women have equal political rights, and female candidates have won some seats beyond the legal quotas set for the parliament and subnational councils, but cultural prejudices remain an obstacle to women’s full participation in practice. Five women won House of Representatives seats outside the quota system in 2016, and four won governorate council seats beyond the reserved positions in 2017. Women performed better at the municipal and local levels, but none won mayoral posts.

Nine seats in the House of Representatives are reserved for Christians and three for Circassians and Chechens together. Christians are not permitted to contest nonreserved seats. Citizens of Palestinian origin, who tend to live in urban areas, make up a majority of the overall population but remain underrepresented in the political system.

C. FUNCTIONING OF GOVERNMENT: 3 / 12

C1.      Do the freely elected head of government and national legislative representatives determine the policies of the government? 0 / 4

The king dominates policymaking and the legislative process. The appointed government submits all draft legislation to the House of Representatives, which may approve, reject, or amend bills, though they cannot become law without approval from the appointed Senate and the king. Groups of 10 or more lawmakers can propose legislation, but the House must then refer it to the government before it can return to the chamber as a draft law. Among other royal prerogatives, the king unilaterally appoints the heads of the armed forces, the intelligence service, and the gendarmerie.

C2.      Are safeguards against official corruption strong and effective? 2 / 4

The government has undertaken some efforts to combat widespread corruption, and the Integrity and Anticorruption Commission (IACC) is tasked with investigating allegations. However, successful prosecutions—particularly of high-ranking officials—remain rare. Anticorruption efforts are undermined by a lack of genuinely independent enforcement institutions and restrictions on investigative journalism and civil society activism.

C3.      Does the government operate with openness and transparency? 1 / 4

Laws governing access to government information are vague, lack procedural detail, and contain sweeping exceptions, according to Access Info Europe and the Centre for Law and Democracy. Officials are not required to make public declarations of their income and assets. The National Assembly does not exercise effective or independent oversight of the government’s budget proposals.

CIVIL LIBERTIES: 25 / 60

D. FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION AND BELIEF: 7 / 16

D1.      Are there free and independent media? 1 / 4

Jordan’s media laws are restrictive, vague, and arbitrarily enforced. Various statutes penalize defamation, criticism of the king or state institutions, harming Jordan’s relations with foreign states, blasphemy, and a lack of media objectivity. Government gag orders and informal instructions to media outlets regarding news coverage are common. News websites face onerous registration requirements that, if not met, can serve as a justification for blocking. Journalists rarely face serious violence or significant jail time for their work, but they often practice self-censorship. The government closed the local offices of the Qatari television network Al-Jazeera in June 2017 as a result of a political dispute between Qatar and neighboring Persian Gulf monarchies.

D2.      Are individuals free to practice and express their religious faith or nonbelief in public and private? 2 / 4

Islam is the state religion. The government monitors sermons at mosques for political, sectarian, or extremist content and has begun issuing recommended texts and themes. Muslim clerics require government authorization to preach or issue religious guidance. Many Christian groups are recognized as religious denominations or associations and can worship freely, though they cannot proselytize among Muslims. While converts from Islam are not prosecuted for apostasy, they face bureaucratic obstacles and harassment in practice. Unrecognized religious groups are allowed to practice their faiths but suffer from a number of disadvantages stemming from their lack of legal status. Atheists and agnostics are required to list a religious affiliation on government documents.

D3.      Is there academic freedom, and is the educational system free from extensive political indoctrination? 2 / 4

There is a degree of academic freedom at Jordanian universities, but intelligence services reportedly monitor academic events and campus life, and administrators work with state officials to scrutinize scholarly material for politically sensitive content.

D4.      Are individuals free to express their personal views on political or other sensitive topics without fear of surveillance or retribution? 2 / 4

Open discussion of topics such as politics, the monarchy, religious affairs, and security issues is somewhat inhibited by the threat of punishment under the various laws governing expression. In January 2017, for example, eight activists were arrested and detained for four weeks after criticizing government corruption on social media.

E. ASSOCIATIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL RIGHTS: 3 / 12 (−1)

E1.      Is there freedom of assembly? 1 / 4

Jordanian law limits free assembly. Authorities require prior notification for any demonstration or event and have broad discretion to disperse public gatherings. Violations of the law on assembly can draw fines and jail time. Security forces have in the past engaged in violent confrontations with protesters, though no incidents featuring serious injuries or deaths were reported during 2017.

E2.      Is there freedom for nongovernmental organizations, particularly those that are engaged in human rights– and governance-related work? 1 / 4 (−1)

While many local and international nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) are able to operate in the country, there are significant restrictions on freedom of association. The Ministry of Social Development has the authority to deny registration as well as requests for foreign funding, and can disband organizations it finds objectionable. The ministry also has broad supervisory powers over NGO operations and activities, and all board members must be vetted by state security officials. In practice, these regulations appear to applied in an opaque and arbitrary manner.

The government issued warnings and denied foreign funding to dozens of NGOs during 2017. The Center for Defending Freedom of Journalists (CDFJ) was accused of operating under an improper registration and ordered to stop accepting foreign funds in September. Separately, in April the cabinet stipulated that the Anti-Money Laundering Law and Counter-Terrorism Financing Law of 2007 would now apply to NGOs, subjecting them to new and onerous regulatory requirements and potential prison time for failure to comply.

Score Change: The score declined from 2 to 1 due to an increase in burdensome regulatory requirements and enforcement actions that restrict NGOs’ ability to operate and obtain financing.

E3.      Is there freedom for trade unions and similar professional or labor organizations? 1 / 4

Workers have the right to form unions, but only in 17 designated industries, and the groups must obtain government approval and join the country’s semiofficial union federation. The right to strike is limited by requirements for advance notice and mediation, and participants in an illegal strike are subject to dismissal.

F. RULE OF LAW: 7 / 16 (+1)

F1.       Is there an independent judiciary? 2 / 4

The judiciary’s independence is limited. Under the 2016 constitutional amendments, the king unilaterally appoints the entire Constitutional Court and the chair of the Judicial Council, which nominates judges for the civil court system and is made up mostly of senior members of the judiciary. Judges of both the civil and the Sharia (Islamic law) courts—which handle personal status matters for Muslims—are formally appointed by royal decree.

F2.       Does due process prevail in civil and criminal matters? 1 / 4

Police can hold suspects for up to six months without filing formal charges, and governors are empowered to impose administrative detention for up to one year. Legal changes adopted during 2017 aimed to limit the excessive use of pretrial detention, in part by capping the length at 18 months for serious charges. In practice the authorities have often ignored procedural safeguards against arbitrary arrest and detention, holding individuals incommunicado or beyond the legal time limits. Criminal and security defendants generally lack access to counsel before trial, impairing their ability to mount a defense. Despite a constitutional prohibition, courts allegedly accept confessions extracted under torture.

F3.       Is there protection from the illegitimate use of physical force and freedom from war and insurgencies? 2 / 4 (+1)

Torture and other mistreatment in custody remain common and rarely draw serious penalties. Prison conditions are generally poor, and inmates reportedly suffer from beatings and other abuse by guards.

The country experienced a number of terrorist attacks and clashes related to disrupted plots associated with the Islamic State (IS) militant group during 2016, causing nearly 30 deaths among security forces and civilians. While terrorism remained a serious threat, there were no similar attacks in 2017.

Score Change: The score improved from 1 to 2 due to a decrease in terrorist attacks compared with previous years.

F4.       Do laws, policies, and practices guarantee equal treatment of various segments of the population? 2 / 4

Women face discrimination in law and in practice. For example, women’s testimony is not equal to men’s in Sharia courts, and certain social benefits favor men over women. Jordanians of Palestinian origin are often excluded from jobs in the public sector and security forces, which are dominated by East Bank tribes. Discrimination against LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender) people is also prevalent and includes the threat of violence, though consensual same-sex sexual activity is not specifically prohibited by law. The authorities have denied registration to NGOs that support the rights of LGBT people. In June 2017, the parliament adopted legislation to improve the rights of people with disabilities, including with regard to discrimination in employment; the quality of enforcement remained unclear.

According to the United Nations, there were nearly 740,000 registered refugees in Jordan as of December 2017, including almost 656,000 from Syria, though the government has reported that the true figure may be double that number. Jordanian authorities forcibly returned some Syrians during 2017 and resisted entry by others encamped along the border, restricting aid flows to the camps for part of the year. Jordan does not accept refugees and asylum seekers for settlement but typically allows those in the country to remain while UN agencies seek more permanent solutions. Most refugees lack access to work permits and instead work informally. The government has sought to provide education to refugee children, but many still do not attend school due to overcrowding and other obstacles.

G. PERSONAL AUTONOMY AND INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS: 8 / 16

G1.      Do individuals enjoy freedom of movement, including the ability to change their place of residence, employment, or education? 2 / 4

Jordanians generally enjoy freedom of domestic movement and international travel. However, refugees face impediments to their rights to travel and change employers, and there have been reports of employers confiscating the passports of foreign migrant workers.

G2.      Are individuals able to exercise the right to own property and establish private businesses without undue interference from state or nonstate actors? 2 / 4

The legal framework generally supports property rights for citizens, but noncitizens—including those with Jordanian mothers—are not automatically granted similar rights. Women do not have equal access to property under Sharia-based inheritance rules. Private business activity is hampered by obstacles such as corruption and the abuse of political or other connections.

G3.      Do individuals enjoy personal social freedoms, including choice of marriage partner and size of family, protection from domestic violence, and control over appearance? 2 / 4

Personal social freedoms are limited by the country’s conservative culture and laws. Women cannot pass citizenship to their children. Matters such as marriage and divorce are generally handled by religious courts, which place women and converts from Islam at a disadvantage and restrict some interfaith marriages. Spousal rape is not a crime.

Modest legal improvements have been enacted in recent years. In April 2017, the parliament adopted legislation to better regulate the processing of domestic violence complaints. Laws enacted in August abolished a penal code provision that allowed rapists to avoid punishment by marrying their victims and eliminated some language allowing reduced sentences for perpetrators of so-called honor crimes. However, reduced sentences were still possible for those who murder a spouse caught committing adultery.

G4.      Do individuals enjoy equality of opportunity and freedom from economic exploitation? 2 / 4

There are approximately 1.4 million migrant workers in Jordan, of whom about a million have no work permit, making them especially vulnerable to exploitation. Most refugees also lack work permits. Labor rights organizations have raised concerns about poor working conditions, forced labor, and sexual abuse in Qualifying Industrial Zones, where mostly female and foreign factory workers process goods for export. Other problematic sectors include agriculture and domestic service. The legal minimum wage remains below the poverty level and excludes large classes of workers. Rules governing matters such as working hours and safety standards are not well enforced.

Scoring Key: X / Y (Z)
X = Score Received
Y = Best Possible Score
Z = Change from Previous Year

Full Methodology

Aggregate Score: 
37
Freedom Rating: 
5.0
Political Rights: 
5
Civil Liberties: 
5