Brazil
Brazil is a democracy that holds competitive elections. The political arena, though polarized, is characterized by vibrant public debate. However, independent journalists and civil society activists risk harassment and violent attack, political violence is high, and the government has struggled to address crime and disproportionate violence against and economic exclusion of minorities.
Research & Recommendations
Brazil
| PR Political Rights | 30 40 |
| CL Civil Liberties | 43 60 |
Overview
Brazil is a democracy that holds competitive elections. Its political arena, though polarized, is characterized by vibrant public debate. However, independent journalists and civil society activists risk harassment and violent attack and political violence is high. Minority groups suffer from crime, disproportionate violence, and economic exclusion, and corruption is endemic at top levels. Societal discrimination and violence against LGBT+ people remain serious problems.
Democratic resilience will increasingly depend on stronger coordination among countries that share a commitment to freedom, the rule of law, and accountable governance.
International support for democratic institutions, civil society, and independent media has been associated with modest but meaningful improvements in democratic governance, and it is far less costly than the military outlays necessitated by rising authoritarian aggression.
Young people are increasingly dissatisfied with democracy—not because they reject its principles, but because they see institutions failing to deliver on them. Programmatic work should create clear pathways for meaningful political participation, from voting and policy engagement to community organizing and public leadership, so that young people can translate their expectations into agency.
Brazil
| A Obstacles to Access | 22 25 |
| B Limits on Content | 24 35 |
| C Violations of User Rights | 20 40 |
Overview
Internet freedom improved slightly in Brazil during the coverage period, though challenges remained. Defamation lawsuits and violence in retaliation for online activities pose an ongoing threat to internet users. During the coverage period, the Supreme Court ruled that a provision in the Civil Framework of the Internet (Marco Civil da Internet, or Marco Civil) that required a court order to remove online content was unconstitutional. Additionally, the ECA Digital, a law aiming to safeguard children online, came into effect. The impact of these policy changes on internet freedom remains to be seen.
Access to the internet is under threat as authoritarian powers continue to create barriers for people to freely express themselves online. Internet shutdowns, throttling, and platform blocking remain among the most common tools of digital repression. At the same time, digital technologies serve as a lifeline for people seeking to expose human rights violations to the outside world and hold dictators accountable.
Protecting privacy online is essential to safeguarding free expression in repressive contexts. Without strong privacy protections, journalists and human rights defenders may self-censor out of a fear of reprisal. Rapid advances in AI—and the growing threat of automated vulnerability exploitation—heighten these risks, leaving civil society organizations increasingly vulnerable to sophisticated cyberattacks.