Beijing's Global Media Influence
2022
Country Reports
- Argentina
Argentina
Scorecard Alternative-
Beijing’s Media Influence Efforts
41 85 High -
Local Resilience & Response
38 85 Notable
Scores are based on a scale of 0 (least influence) to 85 (most influence) -
- Australia
Australia
Scorecard Alternative-
Beijing’s Media Influence Efforts
38 85 High -
Local Resilience and Response
68 85 Very High
Scores are based on a scale of 0 (least influence) to 85 (most influence) -
- Brazil
Brazil
Scorecard Alternative-
Beijing’s Media Influence Efforts
35 85 Notable -
Local Resilience and Response
46 85 High
Scores are based on a scale of 0 (least influence) to 85 (most influence) -
- Chile
Chile
Scorecard Alternative-
Beijing’s Media Influence Efforts
37 85 High -
Local Resilience and Response
45 85 High
Scores are based on a scale of 0 (least influence) to 85 (most influence) -
- Colombia
Colombia
Scorecard Alternative-
Beijing’s Media Influence Efforts
29 85 Low -
Local Resilience and Response
38 85 Notable
Scores are based on a scale of 0 (least influence) to 85 (most influence) -
- France
France
Scorecard Alternative-
Beijing’s Media Influence Efforts
36 85 High -
Local Resilience & Response
63 85 Very High
Scores are based on a scale of 0 (least influence) to 85 (most influence) -
- Ghana
Ghana
Scorecard Alternative-
Beijing’s Media Influence Efforts
29 85 Low -
Local Resilience & Response
25 85 Low
Scores are based on a scale of 0 (least influence) to 85 (most influence) -
- India
India
Scorecard Alternative-
Beijing’s Media Influence Efforts
31 85 Notable -
Local Resilience and Response
40 85 Notable
Scores are based on a scale of 0 (least influence) to 85 (most influence) -
- Indonesia
Indonesia
Scorecard Alternative-
Beijing’s Media Influence Efforts
39 85 High -
Local Resilience & Response
41 85 High
Scores are based on a scale of 0 (least influence) to 85 (most influence) -
- Israel
Israel
Scorecard Alternative-
Beijing’s Media Influence Efforts
23 85 Low -
Local Resilience & Response
43 85 High
Scores are based on a scale of 0 (least influence) to 85 (most influence) -
- Italy
Italy
Scorecard Alternative-
Beijing’s Media Influence Efforts
43 85 High -
Local Resilience & Response
45 85 High
Scores are based on a scale of 0 (least influence) to 85 (most influence) -
- Kenya
Kenya
Scorecard Alternative-
Beijing’s Media Influence Efforts
42 85 High -
Local Resilience & Response
38 85 Notable
Scores are based on a scale of 0 (least influence) to 85 (most influence) -
- Kuwait
Kuwait
Scorecard Alternative-
Beijing’s Media Influence Efforts
30 85 Notable -
Local Resilience and Response
31 85 Low
Scores are based on a scale of 0 (least influence) to 85 (most influence) -
- Malaysia
Malaysia
Scorecard Alternative-
Beijing’s Media Influence Efforts
37 85 High -
Local Resilience & Response
35 85 Notable
Scores are based on a scale of 0 (least influence) to 85 (most influence) -
- Mexico
Mexico
Scorecard Alternative-
Beijing’s Media Influence Efforts
35 85 Notable -
Local Resilience & Response
34 85 Notable
Scores are based on a scale of 0 (least influence) to 85 (most influence) -
- Mozambique
Mozambique
Scorecard Alternative-
Beijing’s Media Influence Efforts
31 85 Notable -
Local Resilience & Response
25 85 Low
Scores are based on a scale of 0 (least influence) to 85 (most influence) -
- Nigeria
Nigeria
Scorecard Alternative-
Beijing’s Media Influence Efforts
47 85 Very High -
Local Resilience & Response
33 85 Notable
Scores are based on a scale of 0 (least influence) to 85 (most influence) -
- Panama
Panama
Scorecard Alternative-
Beijing’s Media Influence Efforts
32 85 Notable -
Local Resilience & Response
30 85 Low
Scores are based on a scale of 0 (least influence) to 85 (most influence) -
- Peru
Peru
Scorecard Alternative-
Beijing’s Media Influence Efforts
39 85 High -
Local Resilience and Response
39 85 Notable
Scores are based on a scale of 0 (least influence) to 85 (most influence) -
- Philippines
Philippines
Scorecard Alternative-
Beijing’s Media Influence Efforts
41 85 High -
Local Resilience & Response
50 85 High
Scores are based on a scale of 0 (least influence) to 85 (most influence) -
- Poland
Poland
Scorecard Alternative-
Beijing’s Media Influence Efforts
31 85 Notable -
Local Resilience & Response
48 85 High
Scores are based on a scale of 0 (least influence) to 85 (most influence) -
- Romania
Romania
Scorecard Alternative-
Beijing’s Media Influence Efforts
31 85 Notable -
Local Resilience & Response
39 85 Notable
Scores are based on a scale of 0 (least influence) to 85 (most influence) -
- Senegal
Senegal
Scorecard Alternative-
Beijing’s Media Influence Efforts
32 85 Notable -
Local Resilience & Response
24 85 Low
Scores are based on a scale of 0 (least influence) to 85 (most influence) -
- South Africa
South Africa
Scorecard Alternative-
Beijing’s Media Influence Efforts
38 85 High -
Local Resilience and Response
58 85 Very High
Scores are based on a scale of 0 (least influence) to 85 (most influence) -
- Spain
Spain
Scorecard Alternative-
Beijing’s Media Influence Efforts
45 85 High -
Local Resilience and Response
45 85 High
Scores are based on a scale of 0 (least influence) to 85 (most influence) -
- Sri Lanka
Sri Lanka
Scorecard Alternative-
Beijing’s Media Influence Efforts
34 85 Notable -
Local Resilience & Response
27 85 Low
Scores are based on a scale of 0 (least influence) to 85 (most influence) -
- Taiwan
Taiwan
Scorecard Alternative-
Beijing’s Media Influence Efforts
55 85 Very High -
Local Resilience & Response
74 85 Very High
Scores are based on a scale of 0 (least influence) to 85 (most influence) -
- Tunisia
Tunisia
Scorecard Alternative-
Beijing’s Media Influence Efforts
25 85 Low -
Local Resilience & Response
33 85 Notable
Scores are based on a scale of 0 (least influence) to 85 (most influence) -
- United Kingdom
United Kingdom
Scorecard Alternative-
Beijing’s Media Influence Efforts
53 85 Very High -
Local Resilience & Response
66 85 Very High
Scores are based on a scale of 0 (least influence) to 85 (most influence) -
- United States
United States
Scorecard Alternative-
Beijing’s Media Influence Efforts
53 85 Very High -
Local Resilience and Response
72 85 Very High
Scores are based on a scale of 0 (least influence) to 85 (most influence) -
More from BGMI
Recommendations
Recommendations for media, governments, civil society, donors, and tech companies.
Acknowledgements
Learn more about BGMI's authors, researchers, reviewers, and donors.
Methodology
More on the research, country selection, and scoring for Freedom House’s BGMI report.
