Bolivia
| PR Political Rights | 30 40 |
| CL Civil Liberties | 39 60 |
Bolivia is a democracy where credible elections have been held regularly. While mass protests and violence erupted after the disputed 2019 elections, later general elections have been credible and fair and stakeholders have accepted the results. Nevertheless, the underlying causes of the political violence of 2019 still pose a threat to the country’s political stability. Child labor and violence against women are persistent problems, independent and investigative journalists face harassment, and the judiciary is highly politicized and hampered by corruption.
This report has been abridged for Freedom in the World 2026 due to ongoing budget constraints. Freedom in the World is entirely funded by nongovernmental sources such as private foundations, corporations, and individuals like you. Please consider making a donation to support future editions of this vital resource.
For additional background information, see the reports from the 2024 and 2025 editions of Freedom in the World.
| Was the current head of government or other chief national authority elected through free and fair elections? | 4.004 4.004 |
| Were the current national legislative representatives elected through free and fair elections? | 4.004 4.004 |
| Are the electoral laws and framework fair, and are they implemented impartially by the relevant election management bodies? | 3.003 4.004 |
Score Change: The score improved from 2 to 3 because the Constitutional Tribunal upheld term limits in accordance with the constitution, and the Supreme Electoral Tribunal oversaw competitive and credible elections.
| Do the people have the right to organize in different political parties or other competitive political groupings of their choice, and is the system free of undue obstacles to the rise and fall of these competing parties or groupings? | 3.003 4.004 |
| Is there a realistic opportunity for the opposition to increase its support or gain power through elections? | 3.003 4.004 |
Score Change: The score improved from 2 to 3 because opposition candidates were able to freely compete in the general elections and secure the presidency after two decades of incumbency by the previous ruling party, which had been aided by its use of public resources to back its campaigns.
| Are the people’s political choices free from domination by forces that are external to the political sphere, or by political forces that employ extrapolitical means? | 3.003 4.004 |
Score Change: The score improved from 2 to 3 because attempts to place extrapolitical pressure on voters, including through road blockades and other efforts, did not significantly influence voter turnout or election results.
| Do various segments of the population (including ethnic, racial, religious, gender, LGBT+, and other relevant groups) have full political rights and electoral opportunities? | 3.003 4.004 |
| Do the freely elected head of government and national legislative representatives determine the policies of the government? | 3.003 4.004 |
Score Change: The score improved from 2 to 3 because a campaign of antigovernment road blockades initiated by former President Evo Morales eventually dissipated, ending a period in which government control over parts of the country’s territory was disrupted.
| Are safeguards against official corruption strong and effective? | 2.002 4.004 |
| Does the government operate with openness and transparency? | 2.002 4.004 |
| Are there free and independent media? | 2.002 4.004 |
| Are individuals free to practice and express their religious faith or nonbelief in public and private? | 4.004 4.004 |
| Is there academic freedom, and is the educational system free from extensive political indoctrination? | 4.004 4.004 |
| Are individuals free to express their personal views on political or other sensitive topics without fear of surveillance or retribution? | 4.004 4.004 |
| Is there freedom of assembly? | 3.003 4.004 |
| Is there freedom for nongovernmental organizations, particularly those that are engaged in human rights– and governance-related work? | 3.003 4.004 |
| Is there freedom for trade unions and similar professional or labor organizations? | 3.003 4.004 |
| Is there an independent judiciary? | 1.001 4.004 |
| Does due process prevail in civil and criminal matters? | 1.001 4.004 |
| Is there protection from the illegitimate use of physical force and freedom from war and insurgencies? | 2.002 4.004 |
| Do laws, policies, and practices guarantee equal treatment of various segments of the population? | 2.002 4.004 |
| Do individuals enjoy freedom of movement, including the ability to change their place of residence, employment, or education? | 3.003 4.004 |
| Are individuals able to exercise the right to own property and establish private businesses without undue interference from state or nonstate actors? | 2.002 4.004 |
| Do individuals enjoy personal social freedoms, including choice of marriage partner and size of family, protection from domestic violence, and control over appearance? | 3.003 4.004 |
| Do individuals enjoy equality of opportunity and freedom from economic exploitation? | 2.002 4.004 |
Country Facts
-
Population
12,220,000 -
Global Freedom Score
69 100 free