Gabon: Country Profile

Research & Recommendations

Freedom in the World 2025

PR Political Rights	2 40
CL Civil Liberties	19 60

Last Year's Score & Status

20 100 Not Free

A country or territory’s Freedom in the World status depends on its aggregate Political Rights score, on a scale of 0–40, and its aggregate Civil Liberties score, on a scale of 0–60. See the methodology.

Overview

Former president Ali Bongo Ondimba succeeded his father Omar in 2009 and maintained political dominance for years through a combination of patronage and repression. He was removed from office by a coup in 2023, which was initially met with widespread support. However, coup leader Brice Oligui Nguema has exerted concerning influence over transitional government business. Significant problems persist, including discrimination against immigrants, marginalization of ethnic minority groups, and legal and de facto inequality for women.

Read the full Gabon Report

Previous Reports: 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025

Freedom in the World 2025 Policy Recommendations

Read all recommendations

Prioritize strengthening the rule of law and delivering economic dividends in the aftermath of political transitions

In countries where democratic forces have come to power after periods of antidemocratic rule, the new governments should pursue an agenda that protects and expands freedoms even as it delivers tangible economic and social benefits to citizens.

In countries emerging from war or the collapse of authoritarian regimes, focus on safety, reconciliation, reform

These countries must act swiftly to release all political prisoners, build or revitalize democratic institutions, reform police and other security forces, organize and hold competitive multiparty elections, and ensure accountability for past human rights violations.

Bolster checks and balances to mitigate the threat of democratic backsliding

In countries where there has been significant erosion of political rights and civil liberties, policymakers, legislators, jurists, civic activists, and donor communities should work to strengthen institutional guardrails and norms that serve to constrain elected leaders with antidemocratic or illiberal aims.