Liechtenstein
| PR Political Rights | 33 40 |
| CL Civil Liberties | 57 60 |
The Principality of Liechtenstein combines a powerful monarchy with a parliamentary system of government. The prince has an influential political role, which was enhanced by a constitutional referendum in 2003. Human rights and civil liberties are generally respected in the country.
- In February, a large majority of voters rejected a constitutional initiative that would have allowed citizens to directly elect members of the government. The initiative had been prepared by the opposition Democrats for Liechtenstein (DpL) party.
- The Council of Europe’s Group of States against Corruption (GRECO), in a compliance report published in March, found that Liechtenstein had made progress in implementing its recommendations. It noted the adoption of a code of conduct for parliament members that took effect in 2023, but called for further improvements, including rules on the declaration of assets, income, and liabilities for lawmakers and their family members.
- In May, the parliament approved a law that legalized same-sex marriage. The law received the prince’s assent in July, and it was set to enter into force in January 2025.
- In an October referendum, voters endorsed a DpL initiative to terminate state funding for Radio Liechtenstein, which would force the public broadcaster to privatize or close; its fate remained unclear at year’s end. The governing parties had opposed the termination. In addition to its sole radio station, Liechtenstein had just one television station, owned by an Austrian company, and one daily newspaper as of 2024.
This report has been abridged for Freedom in the World 2025 due to ongoing budget constraints. Freedom in the World is entirely funded by nongovernmental sources such as private foundations, corporations, and individuals like you. Please consider making a donation to support future editions of this vital resource.
For additional background information, see last year’s full report.
| Was the current head of government or other chief national authority elected through free and fair elections? | 2.002 4.004 |
| Were the current national legislative representatives elected through free and fair elections? | 4.004 4.004 |
| Are the electoral laws and framework fair, and are they implemented impartially by the relevant election management bodies? | 4.004 4.004 |
| Do the people have the right to organize in different political parties or other competitive political groupings of their choice, and is the system free of undue obstacles to the rise and fall of these competing parties or groupings? | 4.004 4.004 |
| Is there a realistic opportunity for the opposition to increase its support or gain power through elections? | 3.003 4.004 |
| Are the people’s political choices free from domination by forces that are external to the political sphere, or by political forces that employ extrapolitical means? | 3.003 4.004 |
| Do various segments of the population (including ethnic, racial, religious, gender, LGBT+, and other relevant groups) have full political rights and electoral opportunities? | 3.003 4.004 |
| Do the freely elected head of government and national legislative representatives determine the policies of the government? | 2.002 4.004 |
| Are safeguards against official corruption strong and effective? | 4.004 4.004 |
| Does the government operate with openness and transparency? | 4.004 4.004 |
| Are there free and independent media? | 3.003 4.004 |
Score Change: The score declined from 4 to 3 because declining media pluralism, including the 2023 closure of the country’s oldest newspaper and the planned privatization or closure of its only radio station, has reinforced a tendency toward self-censorship among local journalists.
| Are individuals free to practice and express their religious faith or nonbelief in public and private? | 4.004 4.004 |
| Is there academic freedom, and is the educational system free from extensive political indoctrination? | 4.004 4.004 |
| Are individuals free to express their personal views on political or other sensitive topics without fear of surveillance or retribution? | 4.004 4.004 |
| Is there freedom of assembly? | 4.004 4.004 |
| Is there freedom for nongovernmental organizations, particularly those that are engaged in human rights– and governance-related work? | 4.004 4.004 |
| Is there freedom for trade unions and similar professional or labor organizations? | 4.004 4.004 |
| Is there an independent judiciary? | 3.003 4.004 |
| Does due process prevail in civil and criminal matters? | 4.004 4.004 |
| Is there protection from the illegitimate use of physical force and freedom from war and insurgencies? | 4.004 4.004 |
| Do laws, policies, and practices guarantee equal treatment of various segments of the population? | 3.003 4.004 |
| Do individuals enjoy freedom of movement, including the ability to change their place of residence, employment, or education? | 4.004 4.004 |
| Are individuals able to exercise the right to own property and establish private businesses without undue interference from state or nonstate actors? | 4.004 4.004 |
| Do individuals enjoy personal social freedoms, including choice of marriage partner and size of family, protection from domestic violence, and control over appearance? | 4.004 4.004 |
Score Change: The score improved from 3 to 4 because the government has legalized adoption and marriage rights for same-sex couples in recent years.
| Do individuals enjoy equality of opportunity and freedom from economic exploitation? | 4.004 4.004 |
Country Facts
-
Population
39,327 -
Global Freedom Score
90 100 free