The Netherlands is a parliamentary democracy with a strong record of safeguarding political rights and civil liberties. Nevertheless, wariness of immigration and Muslim minorities has grown in recent years, and polarization around cultural identity issues has increased. Harsh policies toward irregular migrants and asylum seekers have been a source of controversy.
- In a consultative referendum held in March, a plurality of voters rejected the controversial Intelligence and Security Services Act passed by the parliament in 2017, which gave the government sweeping powers to access telephone and internet records and stoked criticism that it could enable dragnet surveillance of private communications. Despite the referendum results, the law entered into force in May.
- Also in March, the national ombudsman issued a report which concluded that municipalities and security forces, citing public-safety concerns, sometimes restrict assembly rights by confining protesters to certain areas or prohibiting demonstrations if authorities fear violence or disorder.
- In June, the parliament passed a controversial law banning the burqa and niqab (facial veil) in public places including schools, hospitals, public transportation, and government buildings.
|Was the current head of government or other chief national authority elected through free and fair elections?||4.004 4.004|
The Netherlands is a parliamentary constitutional monarchy. The role of the monarch is largely ceremonial. The prime minister is the head of government and is chosen by the parliament after elections. The incumbent prime minister, Mark Rutte, won a third term following parliamentary elections held in March 2017. He formed a coalition government consisting of his own right-wing People’s Party for Freedom and Democracy (VVD) alongside the Christian Democratic Appeal (CDA), Democrats 66 (D66), and the Christian Union.
|Were the current national legislative representatives elected through free and fair elections?||4.004 4.004|
The Netherlands has a bicameral parliament that consists of the 75-seat First Chamber, which is elected indirectly to four-year terms in a proportional vote by the members of the 12 provincial councils; and the 150-seat Second Chamber, which is elected to terms of four years by proportional representation. The latest parliamentary elections, for the Second Chamber in March 2017, were well administered, and all parties accepted the results. The parliament now has thirteen parties, the most since 1972. The far-right Party for Freedom (PVV), which is led by Geert Wilders and has drawn condemnation for its anti-Muslim and xenophobic rhetoric, won 20 seats, the second highest total. However, all other parties refused to form a coalition with the PVV, effectively shutting it out of government.
|Are the electoral laws and framework fair, and are they implemented impartially by the relevant election management bodies?||4.004 4.004|
Elections are administered by the Electoral Council, which works impartially and professionally to carry out Dutch elections.
|Do the people have the right to organize in different political parties or other competitive political groupings of their choice, and is the system free of undue obstacles to the rise and fall of these competing parties or groupings?||4.004 4.004|
Political parties operate freely and regularly rotate in and out of power. The Elections Law does not impose any undue restrictions on the creation of political parties and the registration of candidates for elections. In the 2017 parliamentary elections, the ruling VVD lost 8 seats, while its former coalition partner, the Labor Party, lost 29. Government funding extends to all parties that have participated in the most recent parliamentary elections and have gained at least one seat.
|Is there a realistic opportunity for the opposition to increase its support or gain power through elections?||4.004 4.004|
Opposition parties have a realistic opportunity to increase support or gain power, as evidenced by the 2017 election results in which a number of opposition parties gained seats. The CDA, D66, and the Christian Union joined the governing coalition in 2017 after being in the opposition during the second Rutte cabinet.
|Are the people’s political choices free from domination by the military, foreign powers, religious hierarchies, economic oligarchies, or any other powerful group that is not democratically accountable?||4.004 4.004|
The people are free to make their own political choices without pressure from groups that are not democratically accountable.
|Do various segments of the population (including ethnic, religious, gender, LGBT, and other relevant groups) have full political rights and electoral opportunities?||4.004 4.004|
Minority groups participate freely in the political process, and a number of political parties represent their interests. The DENK (THINK) party, which seeks to represent a broad spectrum of ethnic and religious minorities, as well as voters with migrant backgrounds, won three seats in the 2017 parliamentary elections. The DENK party also won seats in 13 municipalities during the March 2018 municipal elections, including in Amsterdam and Rotterdam. The party has been controversial and centrist parties have accused it of enflaming discontent among migrant communities. On the other hand, the far-right, anti-immigrant Forum for Democracy, whose leader Thierry Baudet has been accused of racism and sexism, won two seats in Amsterdam’s assembly in the 2018 elections.
While most major parties addressed gender issues in their party manifestos, the PVV’s does not mention women.
|Do the freely elected head of government and national legislative representatives determine the policies of the government?||4.004 4.004|
Government policies reflect the choices of freely elected members of parliament. Following the 2017 parliamentary elections, it took a record 225 days for the governing coalition to form, manifesting the fragmentation in Dutch politics.
|Are safeguards against official corruption strong and effective?||4.004 4.004|
The Netherlands has low levels of corruption and anticorruption mechanisms are generally effective.
In an evaluation report published in June 2018, the Council of Europe’s Group of States against Corruption (GRECO) noted that the Dutch government had not made sufficient progress in establishing rules and procedures for the parliament to prevent conflicts of interest and regulate dealings with lobbyists and other third parties.
|Does the government operate with openness and transparency?||4.004 4.004|
Laws are in place recognizing the right to request government information, and they are generally enforced, although critics contend that long delays in responding to requests for information are common. Additionally, these laws do not apply to legislative and judicial bodies. Legislation that would require government institutions to make documents available online rather than by request only has been stalled in the parliament since the Second Chamber passed the bill in 2016.
|Are there free and independent media?||4.004 4.004|
A free and independent press thrives in the Netherlands. In June 2018, reports emerged that the phone records of journalist Jos van de Ven of the newspaper Brabants Dagblad had been seized, as part of a police investigation into a leak that enabled the reporter to reveal the names of candidates for mayor of the city of Den Bosch in 2017, which normally remain confidential. The revelation highlighted the importance of a new law that came into force in October, which strengthened protections for the confidentiality of journalists’ sources.
|Are individuals free to practice and express their religious faith or nonbelief in public and private?||4.004 4.004|
The constitution guarantees freedom of religion, which is generally respected in practice.
|Is there academic freedom, and is the educational system free from extensive political indoctrination?||4.004 4.004|
Academic freedom is largely respected in the Netherlands.
|Are individuals free to express their personal views on political or other sensitive topics without fear of surveillance or retribution?||4.004 4.004|
There are no restrictions on freedom of speech or expression, apart from the criminalization of hate speech. In May 2018, the government implemented the controversial 2017 Intelligence and Security Services Act, which gives intelligence agencies greater latitude in accessing telephone and internet records and stoked criticism that it could enable dragnet surveillance of private communications. The law came into force despite a March consultative referendum in which voters rejected the legislation.
The Netherlands has had lèse majesté laws, which forbid insulting the monarchy, in place since 1881. In April, the Second Chamber passed legislation that would reduce penalties for insulting the king and his family from up to five years in prison to a maximum of four months imprisonment. At year’s end, the legislation awaited passage by the First Chamber.
|Is there freedom of assembly?||4.004 4.004|
Freedom of assembly is constitutionally guaranteed and generally respected in practice. However, in March 2018 the national ombudsman issued a report which concluded that municipalities and security forces, citing public-safety concerns, sometimes restrict assembly rights by confining protesters to certain areas or prohibiting demonstrations if authorities fear violence or disorder. For example, members of a protest group called Kick Out Black Pete, which demonstrates against an annual Christmas tradition in which people dress as a character known as Black Pete and wear blackface, claimed that in November, the mayors of eight cities either prevented protesters from standing near the events’ locations or banned the demonstrations altogether. Most of the mayors feared violence between the anti–Black Pete protesters and counterdemonstrators, some of whom attacked protesters with eggs and bananas and shouted racist epithets.
|Is there freedom for nongovernmental organizations, particularly those that are engaged in human rights– and governance-related work?||4.004 4.004|
Nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) operate freely and without interference from the government or nonstate actors.
|Is there freedom for trade unions and similar professional or labor organizations?||4.004 4.004|
Workers’ rights to organize, bargain collectively, and strike are protected.
|Is there an independent judiciary?||4.004 4.004|
The judiciary is independent, and the rule of law generally prevails in civil and criminal matters.
|Does due process prevail in civil and criminal matters?||4.004 4.004|
The right to a fair trial is legally guaranteed and respected in practice. Defendants have access to legal counsel, and counsel is provided for them if they cannot afford an attorney.
In December 2018, the newspaper NRC Handelsblad published a report contending that a legal provision in place since 2008, which allows the Public Prosecution Service to adjudicate certain cases involving low-level offenses without a judge, has led to thousands of wrongful convictions.
|Is there protection from the illegitimate use of physical force and freedom from war and insurgencies?||4.004 4.004|
The police are under civilian control, and prison conditions mostly meet international standards. However, people suspected or convicted of terrorism may experience treatment that NGOs have considered inhumane, including constant surveillance and regular full-body searches.
|Do laws, policies, and practices guarantee equal treatment of various segments of the population?||3.003 4.004|
The Netherlands has antidiscrimination laws and hate speech laws on the books. While Dutch society is known for its tolerance, rising anti-immigrant sentiment in recent years has been accompanied by more open expression of anti-Islamic views. Perceived discrimination against Muslims is higher in the Netherlands than in many other European countries. Muslims and immigrants experience harassment and intimidation.
Dutch asylum policies have long drawn criticism for being unduly harsh. Asylum seekers and irregular migrants often experience prolonged detentions in prison-like facilities before deportation.
According to the Netherlands Institute for Human Rights, a government body, 35 percent of the discrimination claims it received in 2017 were filed by pregnant women, who experience widespread discrimination in employment.
|Do individuals enjoy freedom of movement, including the ability to change their place of residence, employment, or education?||4.004 4.004|
Residents generally enjoy freedom of movement and choice of residence, employment, and institution of higher education. A counterterrorism law passed in 2017 allows the government to restrict the movement of people suspected of terrorist links. Human rights advocates have complained that the law is vulnerable to abuse.
|Are individuals able to exercise the right to own property and establish private businesses without undue interference from state or nonstate actors?||4.004 4.004|
Property rights are legally protected and generally upheld in practice.
|Do individuals enjoy personal social freedoms, including choice of marriage partner and size of family, protection from domestic violence, and control over appearance?||4.004 4.004|
Personal social freedoms are largely respected. However, in June 2018 the parliament passed a law banning the burqa and niqab in public places including schools, hospitals, public transportation, and government buildings. The passage of the law was applauded by far-right politicians such as Geert Wilders and condemned by critics as discriminatory.
Domestic violence is a persistent problem. According to the Ministry of Justice and Security, over 6 percent of Dutch women surveyed in 2017 experienced domestic violence in the previous five years.
Female genital mutilation, although illegal, still occurs in some immigrant communities. The Ministry of Health, Welfare, and Sport runs a project to prevent the practice.
|Do individuals enjoy equality of opportunity and freedom from economic exploitation?||4.004 4.004|
While the Netherlands is a source, destination, and transit point for human trafficking, the government makes strong efforts to combat it, vigorously investigating and prosecuting suspected traffickers. However, a report published by the Council of Europe’s Group of Experts on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings (GRETA) in October 2018 noted that the number of trafficking prosecutions and convictions has decreased in recent years.
Despite government efforts to combat the exploitation of migrant workers, particularly those from Poland, some employment agencies continue to deny migrant workers overtime pay, demand long work hours, and enable sexual harassment and abuse.
See all data, scores & information on this country or territory.See More
Global Freedom Score97 100 free