Bhutan
| PR Political Rights | 33 40 |
| CL Civil Liberties | 36 60 |
Bhutan is a constitutional monarchy that has undergone democratic consolidation over the past two decades, including credible elections and transfers of power to opposition parties. Ongoing problems include discrimination against minority groups, economic challenges, and the threat of undue interference by the Chinese and Indian governments.
- The Election Commission of Bhutan continued its successful management of local government by-elections during the year, including in particularly remote areas of the country, building confidence in its overall capacity.
- After the administration of US President Donald Trump took office in January, US authorities began deporting dozens of Bhutanese refugees to Bhutan as part of a broader immigration crackdown. Most of them belonged to Nepali-speaking ethnic groups that had been forcibly expelled from Bhutan in the 1990s; they had legally resettled in the United States, and were deported by US officials on the grounds that they had since been convicted of crimes. The Bhutanese government sought to quickly detain and remove the deportees to Nepal, where they also faced detention, confinement in decades-old refugee camps, and the possibility of another deportation. Separately, a number of Nepali-speaking political prisoners who had been detained in the 1990s or early 2000s remained behind bars in Bhutan and allegedly faced harsh conditions.
- The Bhutanese government sought to improve relations with Beijing amid ongoing negotiations over the disputed border area, where Chinese authorities had constructed settlements and military outposts on internationally recognized Bhutanese territory over the past decade. Tibetan activists objected in March when Bhutan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs used the Chinese term “Xizang” to refer to Tibet, arguing that the term contributed to Beijing’s erasure of Tibet’s unique culture.
This report has been abridged for Freedom in the World 2026 due to ongoing budget constraints. Freedom in the World is entirely funded by nongovernmental sources such as private foundations, corporations, and individuals like you. Please consider making a donation to support future editions of this vital resource.
For additional background information, see the reports from the 2024 and 2025 editions of Freedom in the World.
| Was the current head of government or other chief national authority elected through free and fair elections? | 4.004 4.004 |
| Were the current national legislative representatives elected through free and fair elections? | 4.004 4.004 |
| Are the electoral laws and framework fair, and are they implemented impartially by the relevant election management bodies? | 4.004 4.004 |
Score Change: The score improved from 3 to 4 because the election commission has effectively administered by-elections since the last national elections, including in highly remote areas.
| Do the people have the right to organize in different political parties or other competitive political groupings of their choice, and is the system free of undue obstacles to the rise and fall of these competing parties or groupings? | 4.004 4.004 |
| Is there a realistic opportunity for the opposition to increase its support or gain power through elections? | 4.004 4.004 |
| Are the people’s political choices free from domination by forces that are external to the political sphere, or by political forces that employ extrapolitical means? | 3.003 4.004 |
| Do various segments of the population (including ethnic, racial, religious, gender, LGBT+, and other relevant groups) have full political rights and electoral opportunities? | 2.002 4.004 |
| Do the freely elected head of government and national legislative representatives determine the policies of the government? | 3.003 4.004 |
| Are safeguards against official corruption strong and effective? | 3.003 4.004 |
| Does the government operate with openness and transparency? | 3.003 4.004 |
| Is the government or occupying power deliberately changing the ethnic composition of a country or territory so as to destroy a culture or tip the political balance in favor of another group? | -1.00-1 |
| Are there free and independent media? | 3.003 4.004 |
| Are individuals free to practice and express their religious faith or nonbelief in public and private? | 2.002 4.004 |
| Is there academic freedom, and is the educational system free from extensive political indoctrination? | 2.002 4.004 |
| Are individuals free to express their personal views on political or other sensitive topics without fear of surveillance or retribution? | 3.003 4.004 |
| Is there freedom of assembly? | 2.002 4.004 |
| Is there freedom for nongovernmental organizations, particularly those that are engaged in human rights– and governance-related work? | 2.002 4.004 |
| Is there freedom for trade unions and similar professional or labor organizations? | 2.002 4.004 |
| Is there an independent judiciary? | 3.003 4.004 |
| Does due process prevail in civil and criminal matters? | 2.002 4.004 |
| Is there protection from the illegitimate use of physical force and freedom from war and insurgencies? | 3.003 4.004 |
| Do laws, policies, and practices guarantee equal treatment of various segments of the population? | 2.002 4.004 |
| Do individuals enjoy freedom of movement, including the ability to change their place of residence, employment, or education? | 2.002 4.004 |
| Are individuals able to exercise the right to own property and establish private businesses without undue interference from state or nonstate actors? | 3.003 4.004 |
| Do individuals enjoy personal social freedoms, including choice of marriage partner and size of family, protection from domestic violence, and control over appearance? | 3.003 4.004 |
| Do individuals enjoy equality of opportunity and freedom from economic exploitation? | 2.002 4.004 |
Country Facts
-
Population
782,455 -
Global Freedom Score
69 100 free