Bulgaria
| PR Political Rights | 32 40 |
| CL Civil Liberties | 45 60 |
Multiple parties compete in Bulgaria’s democratic system, with peaceful transfers of power occurring between rival groups, though repeated snap elections have failed to produce stable governing majorities in recent years. While the media sector remains pluralistic, outlets are subject to pressure from political and business interests. Members of minority populations, particularly Roma, and the LGBT+ community face discrimination. Despite funding shortages and other obstacles, civil society organizations remain active and influential.
- Prime Minister Nikolay Denkov of the liberal We Continue the Change–Democratic Bulgaria (PP-DB) alliance resigned in March, in keeping with a coalition agreement that would have handed the premiership to the center-right Citizens for European Development of Bulgaria (GERB) party. However, the two partners disagreed on the makeup of the new cabinet, and in April President Rumen Radev appointed a caretaker government—with Dimitar Glavchev, head of the National Audit Office, as prime minister—and called snap parliamentary elections for June. Those elections, which drew record-low voter turnout of just 34 percent, failed to produce a viable governing majority, prompting Radev to call another round of elections for October.
- In the October voting, GERB led with 69 of 240 seats, followed by the PP-DB with 37, the far-right Revival party with 35, the Movement for Rights and Freedoms–New Beginning (DPS-NN) with 30, the Bulgarian Socialist Party (BSP) with 20, the Alliance for Rights and Freedoms (APS) with 19, the right-wing populist There Is Such a People (ITN) with 18, and the far-right Morality, Unity, Honor (MECh) with 12. There were numerous reports of large-scale vote buying and fraud, with many allegations focusing on the DPS-NN and its leader, Delyan Peevski, who had previously faced US and British sanctions for corruption. Numerous last-minute changes to local election commission personnel may have contributed to malfeasance. The Constitutional Court accepted and consolidated five legal challenges seeking to overturn the results, and a ruling was pending at year’s end. Coalition talks were also ongoing, meaning Glavchev remained in place as caretaker prime minister.
- In July, the Constitutional Court struck down a number of the constitutional amendments that had been adopted by the parliament in late 2023, including changes that had divided the Supreme Judicial Council (VSS) into two bodies to separately oversee judges and prosecutors, and that curbed the powers and reduced the term of the prosecutor general. These amendments had earned praise from European Commission experts.
- In August, police in the city of Pazardzhik imposed fines on two women for wearing face-covering veils. A ban on such garments, which are not common among Muslims in Bulgaria, had been imposed first by the city and then at the national level in 2016; it was rarely enforced, however, particularly after the COVID-19 pandemic that began in 2020.
- Also in August, the parliament swiftly adopted a law proposed by the Revival party that aimed to prohibit the dissemination of “propaganda” related to “nontraditional sexual orientation” or “gender identity other than biological” in the country’s schools. Despite protests and calls for a veto, President Radev signed the legislation. Local branches of the Revival party then reportedly used social media to identify and intimidate teachers who publicly expressed disapproval of the law.
This report has been abridged for Freedom in the World 2025 due to ongoing budget constraints. Freedom in the World is entirely funded by nongovernmental sources such as private foundations, corporations, and individuals like you. Please consider making a donation to support future editions of this vital resource.
For additional background information, see last year’s full report.
| Was the current head of government or other chief national authority elected through free and fair elections? | 4.004 4.004 |
| Were the current national legislative representatives elected through free and fair elections? | 3.003 4.004 |
| Are the electoral laws and framework fair, and are they implemented impartially by the relevant election management bodies? | 3.003 4.004 |
| Do the people have the right to organize in different political parties or other competitive political groupings of their choice, and is the system free of undue obstacles to the rise and fall of these competing parties or groupings? | 4.004 4.004 |
| Is there a realistic opportunity for the opposition to increase its support or gain power through elections? | 4.004 4.004 |
| Are the people’s political choices free from domination by forces that are external to the political sphere, or by political forces that employ extrapolitical means? | 3.003 4.004 |
| Do various segments of the population (including ethnic, racial, religious, gender, LGBT+, and other relevant groups) have full political rights and electoral opportunities? | 3.003 4.004 |
| Do the freely elected head of government and national legislative representatives determine the policies of the government? | 3.003 4.004 |
| Are safeguards against official corruption strong and effective? | 2.002 4.004 |
| Does the government operate with openness and transparency? | 3.003 4.004 |
| Are there free and independent media? | 2.002 4.004 |
| Are individuals free to practice and express their religious faith or nonbelief in public and private? | 3.003 4.004 |
| Is there academic freedom, and is the educational system free from extensive political indoctrination? | 3.003 4.004 |
Score Change: The score declined from 4 to 3 because a new law effectively banned discussion of LGBT+ issues in schools, and teachers faced intimidation for voicing opposition to the law.
| Are individuals free to express their personal views on political or other sensitive topics without fear of surveillance or retribution? | 4.004 4.004 |
| Is there freedom of assembly? | 4.004 4.004 |
| Is there freedom for nongovernmental organizations, particularly those that are engaged in human rights– and governance-related work? | 4.004 4.004 |
| Is there freedom for trade unions and similar professional or labor organizations? | 3.003 4.004 |
| Is there an independent judiciary? | 3.003 4.004 |
| Does due process prevail in civil and criminal matters? | 2.002 4.004 |
| Is there protection from the illegitimate use of physical force and freedom from war and insurgencies? | 3.003 4.004 |
| Do laws, policies, and practices guarantee equal treatment of various segments of the population? | 2.002 4.004 |
| Do individuals enjoy freedom of movement, including the ability to change their place of residence, employment, or education? | 4.004 4.004 |
| Are individuals able to exercise the right to own property and establish private businesses without undue interference from state or nonstate actors? | 3.003 4.004 |
| Do individuals enjoy personal social freedoms, including choice of marriage partner and size of family, protection from domestic violence, and control over appearance? | 3.003 4.004 |
| Do individuals enjoy equality of opportunity and freedom from economic exploitation? | 2.002 4.004 |
Country Facts
-
Population
6,465,000 -
Global Freedom Score
77 100 free