Liechtenstein
| PR Political Rights | 33 40 |
| CL Civil Liberties | 57 60 |
The Principality of Liechtenstein combines a powerful monarchy with a parliamentary system of government. The prince has an influential political role, which was enhanced by a constitutional referendum in 2003. Human rights and civil liberties are generally respected in the country.
- In January, a law adopted in 2024 to legalize same-sex marriage entered into force.
- Parliamentary elections were held in February, and the governing conservative Patriotic Union (VU) and Progressive Citizens’ Party (FBP) took 10 and 7 seats, respectively, in the 25-seat legislature. The right-wing opposition Democrats for Liechtenstein party won 6 seats, the best result to date for a third party, while the center-left Free List took the remaining 2. The number of women in the parliament increased from 7 to 8. The VU and FBP formed a new coalition government, and Brigette Haas of the VU became the country’s first woman prime minister in April.
- A needs-assessment report from the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe generally praised the country’s electoral laws and election administration, though it noted some concern about constituency sizes, the relatively high 8 percent threshold for parties to win representation, and other topics for potential reform.
- In April, the government shut down Radio Liechtenstein, the country’s only radio station, because no private party had expressed interest in a takeover, and because there was no political agreement on reversing the effects of a 2024 referendum in which a majority of voters had supported terminating public funding for the station. The move followed the 2023 closure of a major newspaper and added to concerns about the diversity of Liechtenstein’s media landscape.
- A May report from the Group of States against Corruption (GRECO) identified remaining gaps in Liechtenstein’s anticorruption framework, including the prince’s authority under the constitution to block or discontinue prosecutions and its potential use to quash cases against government officials accused of corruption.
This report has been abridged for Freedom in the World 2026 due to ongoing budget constraints. Freedom in the World is entirely funded by nongovernmental sources such as private foundations, corporations, and individuals like you. Please consider making a donation to support future editions of this vital resource.
For additional background information, see the reports from the 2024 and 2025 editions of Freedom in the World.
| Was the current head of government or other chief national authority elected through free and fair elections? | 2.002 4.004 |
| Were the current national legislative representatives elected through free and fair elections? | 4.004 4.004 |
| Are the electoral laws and framework fair, and are they implemented impartially by the relevant election management bodies? | 4.004 4.004 |
| Do the people have the right to organize in different political parties or other competitive political groupings of their choice, and is the system free of undue obstacles to the rise and fall of these competing parties or groupings? | 4.004 4.004 |
| Is there a realistic opportunity for the opposition to increase its support or gain power through elections? | 3.003 4.004 |
| Are the people’s political choices free from domination by forces that are external to the political sphere, or by political forces that employ extrapolitical means? | 3.003 4.004 |
| Do various segments of the population (including ethnic, racial, religious, gender, LGBT+, and other relevant groups) have full political rights and electoral opportunities? | 3.003 4.004 |
| Do the freely elected head of government and national legislative representatives determine the policies of the government? | 2.002 4.004 |
| Are safeguards against official corruption strong and effective? | 4.004 4.004 |
| Does the government operate with openness and transparency? | 4.004 4.004 |
| Are there free and independent media? | 3.003 4.004 |
| Are individuals free to practice and express their religious faith or nonbelief in public and private? | 4.004 4.004 |
| Is there academic freedom, and is the educational system free from extensive political indoctrination? | 4.004 4.004 |
| Are individuals free to express their personal views on political or other sensitive topics without fear of surveillance or retribution? | 4.004 4.004 |
| Is there freedom of assembly? | 4.004 4.004 |
| Is there freedom for nongovernmental organizations, particularly those that are engaged in human rights– and governance-related work? | 4.004 4.004 |
| Is there freedom for trade unions and similar professional or labor organizations? | 4.004 4.004 |
| Is there an independent judiciary? | 3.003 4.004 |
| Does due process prevail in civil and criminal matters? | 4.004 4.004 |
| Is there protection from the illegitimate use of physical force and freedom from war and insurgencies? | 4.004 4.004 |
| Do laws, policies, and practices guarantee equal treatment of various segments of the population? | 3.003 4.004 |
| Do individuals enjoy freedom of movement, including the ability to change their place of residence, employment, or education? | 4.004 4.004 |
| Are individuals able to exercise the right to own property and establish private businesses without undue interference from state or nonstate actors? | 4.004 4.004 |
| Do individuals enjoy personal social freedoms, including choice of marriage partner and size of family, protection from domestic violence, and control over appearance? | 4.004 4.004 |
| Do individuals enjoy equality of opportunity and freedom from economic exploitation? | 4.004 4.004 |
Country Facts
-
Population
39,327 -
Global Freedom Score
90 100 free