Timor-Leste
Timor-Leste has held competitive elections and undergone peaceful transfers of power, but its democratic institutions remain fragile. Judicial independence and due process are undermined by serious capacity deficits and political influence.
Research & Recommendations
Timor-Leste
| PR Political Rights | 33 40 |
| CL Civil Liberties | 39 60 |
Overview
Timor-Leste has held competitive elections and undergone peaceful transfers of power since gaining independence in 2002, but its democratic institutions remain fragile, and disputes among leaders from the independence struggle dominate political affairs. Due process is undermined by serious capacity deficits.
In countries where democratic forces have come to power after periods of antidemocratic rule, the new governments should pursue an agenda that protects and expands freedoms even as it delivers tangible economic and social benefits to citizens.
These countries must act swiftly to release all political prisoners, build or revitalize democratic institutions, reform police and other security forces, organize and hold competitive multiparty elections, and ensure accountability for past human rights violations.
In countries where there has been significant erosion of political rights and civil liberties, policymakers, legislators, jurists, civic activists, and donor communities should work to strengthen institutional guardrails and norms that serve to constrain elected leaders with antidemocratic or illiberal aims.