Egypt
| A Obstacles to Access | 14 25 |
| B Limits on Content | 9 35 |
| C Violations of User Rights | 5 40 |
Internet freedom and the rights of internet users remained severely constrained in Egypt during the coverage period. Authorities cracked down on efforts to mobilize around political or social issues online by blocking communications platforms and arresting people for joining political groups organized on social media.1 The risk of criminal penalties, harassment, and surveillance contributed to high levels of self-censorship among users. Detained activists, bloggers, and journalists routinely suffered abuse and torture in detention.
This report has been abridged for Freedom on the Net 2026. Please consider making a donation to support future editions of this vital resource. For additional information, see the 2024 full report and 2025 abridged report.
- 1“Egypt: Release dozens detained over Gen Z online group calling for political change,” Amnesty International, July 21, 2026, https://www.amnesty.org.uk/latest/egypt-release-dozens-detained-over-ge…; “Egypt must end enforced disappearances targeting Gen Z on Discord,” Skyline International for Human Rights, July 7, 2026, https://skylineforhuman.org/en/news/details/931/egypt-must-end-enforced…; Stephan Roll and Josef Schreck, “The Calm before the Storm? Egypt’s Youth under President al-Sisi,” Megatrends Afrika, March 23, 2026, https://www.megatrends-afrika.de/publikation/mta-spotlight-68-egypts-yo….
| Do infrastructural limitations restrict access to the internet or the speed and quality of internet connections? | 5.005 6.006 |
Score Change: The score improved from 4 to 5 because internet penetration rates have increased, according to some measurement sources, and because the load shedding that had caused disruptions in previous coverage periods was not repeated.
| Is access to the internet prohibitively expensive or beyond the reach of certain segments of the population for geographical, social, or other reasons? | 1.001 3.003 |
Score Change: The score declined from 2 to 1 because rising inflation as a result of regional conflict, as well as a price hike in internet packages, has significantly increased the cost of internet services in Egypt.1
- 1Abdallah El-Bastaweesy, “New price hikes on internet packages reach 15%,” Manassa, May 6, 2026, https://manassa.news/en/news/31771; “The Right to Connectivity Under Price Pressure,” Masaar, May 11, 2026, https://masaar.net/en/the-right-to-connectivity-under-price-pressures/; “Egypt introduces new affordable internet plans amid 15% telecom price hikes,” Egypt Today, May 6, 2026, https://www.egypttoday.com/Article/3/146940/Egypt-introduces-new-afford….
| Does the government exercise technical or legal control over internet infrastructure for the purposes of restricting connectivity? | 4.004 6.006 |
| Are there legal, regulatory, or economic obstacles that restrict the diversity of service providers? | 3.003 6.006 |
| Do national regulatory bodies that oversee service providers, digital platforms, and the internet more broadly fail to operate in a free, fair, and independent manner? | 1.001 4.004 |
| Does the state block or filter, or compel service providers to block or filter, internet content, particularly material that is protected by international human rights standards? | 1.001 6.006 |
| Do state or nonstate actors employ legal, administrative, or other means to force publishers, digital platforms, content hosts, or other intermediaries to delete content, particularly material that is protected by international human rights standards? | 1.001 4.004 |
| Do restrictions on the internet and digital content lack transparency, proportionality to the stated aims, or an independent appeals process? | 1.001 4.004 |
| Do journalists, commentators, and ordinary people practice self-censorship online? | 1.001 4.004 |
| Are online sources of information controlled or manipulated by the government or other powerful actors to advance a favored interest? | 1.001 4.004 |
| Are there economic, regulatory, or other constraints that negatively affect individuals’ ability to publish content online? | 0.000 3.003 |
| Does the online information landscape lack diversity and reliability? | 2.002 4.004 |
| Do conditions impede individuals’ ability to form communities, mobilize, and campaign online, particularly on political and social issues? | 2.002 6.006 |
| Do the constitution or other laws fail to protect rights such as freedom of expression, access to information, and press freedom, including on the internet, and are they enforced by a judiciary that lacks independence? | 0.000 6.006 |
| Are there laws that assign criminal penalties or civil liability for online activities, particularly those that are protected under international human rights standards? | 0.000 4.004 |
| Are individuals penalized for online activities, particularly those that are protected under international human rights standards? | 0.000 6.006 |
| Does the government place restrictions on anonymous online communication or encryption? | 1.001 4.004 |
| Does state surveillance of internet activities infringe on individuals’ right to privacy? | 1.001 6.006 |
| Does monitoring and collection of user data by service providers and other technology companies infringe on individuals’ right to privacy? | 0.000 6.006 |
| Are individuals subject to extralegal intimidation or physical violence by state authorities or any other actor in relation to their online activities? | 1.001 5.005 |
| Are websites, governmental and private entities, service providers, or individuals subject to widespread hacking and other forms of cyberattack? | 2.002 3.003 |
Country Facts
-
Population
111,000,000 -
Global Freedom Score
18 100 not free -
Internet Freedom Score
28 100 not free -
Freedom in the World Status
Not Free