Mauritius
| PR Political Rights | 35 40 |
| CL Civil Liberties | 51 60 |
Mauritius is home to an open, multiparty system that has allowed for the regular handover of power between parties through elections. Civil liberties have historically been upheld, but political leadership is dominated by a few families, and ethnic divisions remain prominent in politics. Among other concerns, corruption persists, long-discussed electoral reforms have not been enacted, journalists report limitations on their work and occasional harassment, and the integration of women into the political system has been slow.
- In November parliamentary elections, the opposition Alliance for Change—led by the Labour Party and the Mauritian Militant Movement—secured an overwhelming victory, capturing 60 of the 62 directly elected seats. The Rodrigues People’s Organisation, based on the smaller island of Rodrigues, took the other two seats. Under the country’s “best loser” seat-allocation system, an alliance of Rodrigues-based parties received 2 additional seats, and 1 each was granted to the previously governing Militant Socialist Movement (MSM) and its ally the Mauritian Social Democratic Party. The MSM’s campaign had suffered in part from a scandal in which leaked audio recordings seemed to implicate politicians, public officials, and others in wrongdoing; the government attempted to ban social media in response, but it quickly reversed the unpopular move.
- The Labour Party’s Navin Ramgoolam took office as prime minister after the elections, having previously held the post from 1995 to 2000 and 2005 to 2014. The new parliament unanimously elected Dharam Gokhool to the country’s largely ceremonial presidency in December.
- Separately in December, Prime Minister Ramgoolam said the new government would revisit a tentative October agreement in which the United Kingdom (UK) pledged to cede sovereignty over the Chagos Archipelago to Mauritius in exchange for a long-term lease on the UK’s military base on the island of Diego Garcia. The agreement also envisioned the return of Chagossians who had been displaced from the archipelago in the 1960s, along with their descendants, with the exception of Diego Garcia. The deal had drawn criticism from some quarters in both countries and in the United States, which uses the UK military base, and its future remained unclear at year’s end.
This report has been abridged for Freedom in the World 2025 due to ongoing budget constraints. Freedom in the World is entirely funded by nongovernmental sources such as private foundations, corporations, and individuals like you. Please consider making a donation to support future editions of this vital resource.
For additional background information, see last year’s full report.
| Was the current head of government or other chief national authority elected through free and fair elections? | 4.004 4.004 |
| Were the current national legislative representatives elected through free and fair elections? | 4.004 4.004 |
| Are the electoral laws and framework fair, and are they implemented impartially by the relevant election management bodies? | 3.003 4.004 |
| Do the people have the right to organize in different political parties or other competitive political groupings of their choice, and is the system free of undue obstacles to the rise and fall of these competing parties or groupings? | 4.004 4.004 |
| Is there a realistic opportunity for the opposition to increase its support or gain power through elections? | 3.003 4.004 |
| Are the people’s political choices free from domination by forces that are external to the political sphere, or by political forces that employ extrapolitical means? | 4.004 4.004 |
| Do various segments of the population (including ethnic, racial, religious, gender, LGBT+, and other relevant groups) have full political rights and electoral opportunities? | 3.003 4.004 |
| Do the freely elected head of government and national legislative representatives determine the policies of the government? | 4.004 4.004 |
| Are safeguards against official corruption strong and effective? | 3.003 4.004 |
| Does the government operate with openness and transparency? | 3.003 4.004 |
| Are there free and independent media? | 3.003 4.004 |
| Are individuals free to practice and express their religious faith or nonbelief in public and private? | 4.004 4.004 |
| Is there academic freedom, and is the educational system free from extensive political indoctrination? | 4.004 4.004 |
| Are individuals free to express their personal views on political or other sensitive topics without fear of surveillance or retribution? | 3.003 4.004 |
| Is there freedom of assembly? | 4.004 4.004 |
| Is there freedom for nongovernmental organizations, particularly those that are engaged in human rights– and governance-related work? | 4.004 4.004 |
| Is there freedom for trade unions and similar professional or labor organizations? | 4.004 4.004 |
Score Change: The score improved from 3 to 4 because there have been no recent reports of the 2020 COVID-19 Act being used to restrict workers’ rights, and because labor unions freely advocated for their interests during the 2024 election period, in part by calling for a constitutional right to strike.
| Is there an independent judiciary? | 3.003 4.004 |
| Does due process prevail in civil and criminal matters? | 4.004 4.004 |
| Is there protection from the illegitimate use of physical force and freedom from war and insurgencies? | 3.003 4.004 |
| Do laws, policies, and practices guarantee equal treatment of various segments of the population? | 3.003 4.004 |
| Do individuals enjoy freedom of movement, including the ability to change their place of residence, employment, or education? | 4.004 4.004 |
| Are individuals able to exercise the right to own property and establish private businesses without undue interference from state or nonstate actors? | 3.003 4.004 |
| Do individuals enjoy personal social freedoms, including choice of marriage partner and size of family, protection from domestic violence, and control over appearance? | 3.003 4.004 |
| Do individuals enjoy equality of opportunity and freedom from economic exploitation? | 2.002 4.004 |
Country Facts
-
Population
1,263,000 -
Global Freedom Score
86 100 free