Romania
| PR Political Rights | 34 40 |
| CL Civil Liberties | 48 60 |
Romania’s multiparty system has ensured regular rotations of power through competitive elections. Civil liberties are generally respected but have come under growing pressure as entrenched political interests push back against civic and institutional efforts to combat systemic corruption. Discrimination against ethnic and religious minorities and other vulnerable groups is a long-standing problem, as is control of key media outlets by businesspeople with political interests.
- The far-right politician Călin Georgescu unexpectedly won the first round of Romania’s presidential election, held in November, taking 22 percent of the vote amid a field of several candidates. Georgescu, who was unaffiliated with any political party and did most campaigning on social media, was critical of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and European Union (EU), opposed Romanian assistance to Ukraine as it fought against a full-scale Russian invasion, and had praised Romania’s fascist World War II–era leader. Voter turnout was 51 percent.
- On December 6, two days before the presidential runoff in which Georgescu was to face Elena Lasconi of the Save Romania Union (USR), the Constitutional Court annulled the results of the election’s first round, which it had certified on December 2 following a recount. In its annulment ruling, the court cited documents declassified on December 4 by Romanian intelligence services that said that the Russian state had engaged in online election interference, and which suggested that these efforts had benefitted Georgescu. US Secretary of State Antony Blinken expressed support for the Romanian intelligence service’s findings. Referencing official campaign declarations, the Constitutional Court also noted serious irregularities in electoral-campaign financing.
- The governing coalition, led by Prime Minister Marcel Ciolacu of the Social Democratic Party (PSD), won a majority in both legislative chambers in the December 1 parliamentary elections, but with considerably lower support compared to the 2020 elections. The polls took place without major incident and stakeholders accepted the results. The PSD formed a government with its previous coalition partners, the National Liberal Party (PNL) and Democratic Union of Hungarians in Romania (UMDR), and Ciolacu was reappointed prime minister.
- Corruption cases persisted. In February, Romania’s National Anticorruption Directorate (DNA) opened a criminal investigation against Iulian Dumitrescu, who was president of the county council in Prahova and a PNL vice president, for allegedly demanding a bribe worth 47.5 million lei ($10.2 million) from a businessman, of which the complaint said he had collected about a third. In April, the European Public Prosecutor’s Office conducted searches in Brăila County, in a suspected fraud case involving EU agricultural funds amounting to more than €500,000 ($5.3 million). A civil servant’s home was among the search targets.
This report has been abridged for Freedom in the World 2025 due to ongoing budget constraints. Freedom in the World is entirely funded by nongovernmental sources such as private foundations, corporations, and individuals like you. Please consider making a donation to support future editions of this vital resource.
For additional background information, see last year’s full report.
| Was the current head of government or other chief national authority elected through free and fair elections? | 3.003 4.004 |
Score Change: The score declined from 4 to 3 because the Constitutional Court annulled the first-round results of the presidential election over allegations of foreign election interference and campaign-finance irregularities, necessitating a rerun and prompting the incumbent to remain in office beyond the end of his term.
| Were the current national legislative representatives elected through free and fair elections? | 4.004 4.004 |
| Are the electoral laws and framework fair, and are they implemented impartially by the relevant election management bodies? | 4.004 4.004 |
| Do the people have the right to organize in different political parties or other competitive political groupings of their choice, and is the system free of undue obstacles to the rise and fall of these competing parties or groupings? | 4.004 4.004 |
| Is there a realistic opportunity for the opposition to increase its support or gain power through elections? | 4.004 4.004 |
| Are the people’s political choices free from domination by forces that are external to the political sphere, or by political forces that employ extrapolitical means? | 3.003 4.004 |
| Do various segments of the population (including ethnic, racial, religious, gender, LGBT+, and other relevant groups) have full political rights and electoral opportunities? | 3.003 4.004 |
| Do the freely elected head of government and national legislative representatives determine the policies of the government? | 4.004 4.004 |
| Are safeguards against official corruption strong and effective? | 2.002 4.004 |
| Does the government operate with openness and transparency? | 3.003 4.004 |
| Are there free and independent media? | 3.003 4.004 |
| Are individuals free to practice and express their religious faith or nonbelief in public and private? | 3.003 4.004 |
| Is there academic freedom, and is the educational system free from extensive political indoctrination? | 3.003 4.004 |
| Are individuals free to express their personal views on political or other sensitive topics without fear of surveillance or retribution? | 4.004 4.004 |
| Is there freedom of assembly? | 4.004 4.004 |
| Is there freedom for nongovernmental organizations, particularly those that are engaged in human rights– and governance-related work? | 4.004 4.004 |
| Is there freedom for trade unions and similar professional or labor organizations? | 3.003 4.004 |
| Is there an independent judiciary? | 3.003 4.004 |
| Does due process prevail in civil and criminal matters? | 3.003 4.004 |
| Is there protection from the illegitimate use of physical force and freedom from war and insurgencies? | 3.003 4.004 |
| Do laws, policies, and practices guarantee equal treatment of various segments of the population? | 3.003 4.004 |
| Do individuals enjoy freedom of movement, including the ability to change their place of residence, employment, or education? | 4.004 4.004 |
| Are individuals able to exercise the right to own property and establish private businesses without undue interference from state or nonstate actors? | 2.002 4.004 |
| Do individuals enjoy personal social freedoms, including choice of marriage partner and size of family, protection from domestic violence, and control over appearance? | 3.003 4.004 |
| Do individuals enjoy equality of opportunity and freedom from economic exploitation? | 3.003 4.004 |
Country Facts
-
Population
19,050,000 -
Global Freedom Score
82 100 free