Serbia
| A Obstacles to Access | 21 25 |
| B Limits on Content | 23 35 |
| C Violations of User Rights | 22 40 |
Internet freedom in Serbia continued to decline during the coverage period. The government maintained its crackdown on widespread protests that began after the 2024 collapse of a train station canopy in Novi Sad, which had killed 16 people. Authorities detained social media users and journalists for content and reporting related to the demonstrations or perceived to be critical of the government.1 Online journalists experienced violence and harassment, both online and in person,2 and media outlets faced a barrage of strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs).3 Also during the coverage period, a series of coordinated attacks attempted to shut down the Instagram accounts of activists, journalists, and media outlets.4 The state-owned Telekom Serbia and progovernment figures continued to acquire media outlets, including digital platforms.5
This report has been abridged for Freedom on the Net 2026. Please consider making a donation to support future editions of this vital resource. For additional information, see the 2024 full report and 2025 abridged report.
- 1Marija Jankovic, “‘This Will Happen to You’: Critics See Intimidation Behind Serbia Arrests,” Balkan Insight, September 26, 2025, https://balkaninsight.com/2025/09/26/this-will-happen-to-you-critics-se…; Milana Milošević, “Student Stefan Tomić uhapšen zbog slanja poruke putem WhatsApp-a na studentsku grupu [Student Stefan Tomić arrested for sending a message via WhatsApp to a student group],” Nedeljnik, June 25, 2025, https://www.nedeljnik.rs/student-stefan-tomic-uhapsen-zbog-slanja-poruk…; SHARE Foundation, “Digital sabotage and physical endangerment,” March 4, 2026, https://sharefoundation.info/en/digital-sabotage-and-physical-endangerm…; SHARE Foundation, “Osvrt na deceniju povreda i nastavak građanske pobune [A look back at a decade of injury and continued civil insurgency],” July 18, 2025, https://sharefoundation.info/osvrt-na-deceniju-povreda-i-nastavak-gradj….
- 2Independent Journalists Association of Serbia, “SafeJournalists and EFJ: Brutal assaults on journalists reporting on the local election in Serbia require urgent response from authorities,” March 30, 2026, https://en.nuns.rs/serbia-brutal-assaults-on-journalists-reporting-on-t…; Index on Censorship, “Serbian authorities must stop the spiral of violence against journalists,” March 31, 2026, https://www.indexoncensorship.org/2026/03/serbian-authorities-must-stop…; Reporters Without Borders, “Protests in Serbia: at least 89 attacks on journalists recorded by RSF in one year,” October 29, 2025, https://rsf.org/en/protests-serbia-least-89-attacks-journalists-recorde….
- 3Index on Censorship, “Serbian authorities must stop the spiral of violence against journalists,” March 31, 2026, https://www.indexoncensorship.org/2026/03/serbian-authorities-must-stop….
- 4SHARE Foundation, “Instagram Sabotage: The Saga Continues,” February 13, 2026, https://sharefoundation.info/en/instagram-sabotage-the-saga-continues/.
- 5Valentina Bajic, “Telekom Srbija buys majority stake in media firm Mondo,” SeeNext, January 13, 2026, https://seenews.com/news/telekom-srbija-buys-majority-stake-in-media-fi…; Stefan Kosanović and Milica Ljubičić, “Dragan J. Vučićević postao manjinski vlasnik desetak medija širom Srbije [Dragan J. Vučićević becomes minority owner of a dozen media outlets across Serbia],” Raskrikavanje, February 27, 2026, https://raskrikavanje.rs/dragan-j-vucicevic-postao-manjinski-vlasnik-de…; Independent Journalists Association of Serbia, “Urgent Warning: Coordinated Takeover of Independent Media in Serbia,” April 4, 2026, https://en.nuns.rs/urgent-warning-coordinated-takeover-of-independent-m….
| Do infrastructural limitations restrict access to the internet or the speed and quality of internet connections? | 6.006 6.006 |
| Is access to the internet prohibitively expensive or beyond the reach of certain segments of the population for geographical, social, or other reasons? | 2.002 3.003 |
| Does the government exercise technical or legal control over internet infrastructure for the purposes of restricting connectivity? | 6.006 6.006 |
| Are there legal, regulatory, or economic obstacles that restrict the diversity of service providers? | 3.003 6.006 |
| Do national regulatory bodies that oversee service providers, digital platforms, and the internet more broadly fail to operate in a free, fair, and independent manner? | 4.004 4.004 |
| Does the state block or filter, or compel service providers to block or filter, internet content, particularly material that is protected by international human rights standards? | 5.005 6.006 |
Score Change: The score declined from 6 to 5 because gambling websites were blocked during the coverage period.1
- 1OONI Explorer, “Web Connectivity Test: Serbia,” May 2026, https://explorer.ooni.org/search?since=2026-01-01&until=2026-05-31&fail….
| Do state or nonstate actors employ legal, administrative, or other means to force publishers, digital platforms, content hosts, or other intermediaries to delete content, particularly material that is protected by international human rights standards? | 3.003 4.004 |
| Do restrictions on the internet and digital content lack transparency, proportionality to the stated aims, or an independent appeals process? | 3.003 4.004 |
| Do journalists, commentators, and ordinary people practice self-censorship online? | 2.002 4.004 |
| Are online sources of information controlled or manipulated by the government or other powerful actors to advance a favored interest? | 1.001 4.004 |
| Are there economic, regulatory, or other constraints that negatively affect individuals’ ability to publish content online? | 2.002 3.003 |
| Does the online information landscape lack diversity and reliability? | 3.003 4.004 |
| Do conditions impede individuals’ ability to form communities, mobilize, and campaign online, particularly on political and social issues? | 4.004 6.006 |
| Do the constitution or other laws fail to protect rights such as freedom of expression, access to information, and press freedom, including on the internet, and are they enforced by a judiciary that lacks independence? | 4.004 6.006 |
| Are there laws that assign criminal penalties or civil liability for online activities, particularly those that are protected under international human rights standards? | 3.003 4.004 |
| Are individuals penalized for online activities, particularly those that are protected under international human rights standards? | 4.004 6.006 |
| Does the government place restrictions on anonymous online communication or encryption? | 3.003 4.004 |
| Does state surveillance of internet activities infringe on individuals’ right to privacy? | 2.002 6.006 |
| Does monitoring and collection of user data by service providers and other technology companies infringe on individuals’ right to privacy? | 3.003 6.006 |
| Are individuals subject to extralegal intimidation or physical violence by state authorities or any other actor in relation to their online activities? | 2.002 5.005 |
| Are websites, governmental and private entities, service providers, or individuals subject to widespread hacking and other forms of cyberattack? | 1.001 3.003 |
Country Facts
-
Population
6,664,000 -
Global Freedom Score
53 100 partly free -
Internet Freedom Score
66 100 partly free -
Freedom in the World Status
Partly Free