Turkey
| A Obstacles to Access | 14 25 |
| B Limits on Content | 10 35 |
| C Violations of User Rights | 7 40 |
Internet freedom remained heavily restricted in Turkey during the coverage period and the government continued to enforce a host of repressive laws to curtail online expression. Access to social media platforms was throttled during opposition demonstrations, and authorities issued scores of orders to block websites and remove content.1 Online troll networks continued to amplify progovernment disinformation, and journalists, activists, and social media users faced criminal charges for the content they posted. An age-verification law that was passed in April 2026—although it had not been enacted by the end of the coverage period—threatens online privacy by requiring social media platforms to install age-verification systems or face heavy fines and bandwidth restrictions.2
This report has been abridged for Freedom on the Net 2026. Please consider making a donation to support future editions of this vital resource. For additional information, see the 2024 full report and 2025 abridged report.
- 1Emre Basaran, “Turkey restricts internet access amid opposition party standoff,” Euro News, September 8, 2025, https://www.euronews.com/2025/09/08/turkey-restricts-internet-access-am….
- 2
Ben Hubbard and Safak Timur, “Turkey Passes Legislation Barring Children Under 15 From Social Media,” New York Times, April 24, 2026, https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/24/world/europe/turkey-ban-children-soc…; “Turkey passes law banning social media use for under-15s,” Reuters, April 24, 2026, https://www.reuters.com/business/media-telecom/turkey-passes-law-bannin…; “Turkish gov’t developing online age checks under new social media law,” Turkish Minute, September 14, 2026, https://www.turkishminute.com/2026/09/14/turkish-govt-developing-online….
| Do infrastructural limitations restrict access to the internet or the speed and quality of internet connections? | 6.006 6.006 |
Score Change: The score improved from 5 to 6 because some infrastructural repairs have been made and connectivity has been largely restored to areas in southern Turkey that were impacted by the February 2023 earthquakes.1
- 1“Turkey’s Sultansuyu Dam returns to full capacity after major post-earthquake rehabilitation,” International Water Power and Dam Construction, April 17, 2026, https://www.waterpowermagazine.com/news/turkeys-sultansuyu-dam-returns-…; Mert Davut, “Türkiye’s earthquake-stricken zone receives $91.5B in public spending over last 3 years,” AA, February 6, 2026, https://www.aa.com.tr/en/turkiye/turkiye-s-earthquake-stricken-zone-rec….
| Is access to the internet prohibitively expensive or beyond the reach of certain segments of the population for geographical, social, or other reasons? | 1.001 3.003 |
| Does the government exercise technical or legal control over internet infrastructure for the purposes of restricting connectivity? | 3.003 6.006 |
| Are there legal, regulatory, or economic obstacles that restrict the diversity of service providers? | 3.003 6.006 |
| Do national regulatory bodies that oversee service providers, digital platforms, and the internet more broadly fail to operate in a free, fair, and independent manner? | 1.001 4.004 |
| Does the state block or filter, or compel service providers to block or filter, internet content, particularly material that is protected by international human rights standards? | 1.001 6.006 |
| Do state or nonstate actors employ legal, administrative, or other means to force publishers, digital platforms, content hosts, or other intermediaries to delete content, particularly material that is protected by international human rights standards? | 0.000 4.004 |
| Do restrictions on the internet and digital content lack transparency, proportionality to the stated aims, or an independent appeals process? | 1.001 4.004 |
| Do journalists, commentators, and ordinary people practice self-censorship online? | 1.001 4.004 |
| Are online sources of information controlled or manipulated by the government or other powerful actors to advance a favored interest? | 1.001 4.004 |
| Are there economic, regulatory, or other constraints that negatively affect individuals’ ability to publish content online? | 1.001 3.003 |
| Does the online information landscape lack diversity and reliability? | 2.002 4.004 |
| Do conditions impede individuals’ ability to form communities, mobilize, and campaign online, particularly on political and social issues? | 3.003 6.006 |
| Do the constitution or other laws fail to protect rights such as freedom of expression, access to information, and press freedom, including on the internet, and are they enforced by a judiciary that lacks independence? | 1.001 6.006 |
| Are there laws that assign criminal penalties or civil liability for online activities, particularly those that are protected under international human rights standards? | 1.001 4.004 |
| Are individuals penalized for online activities, particularly those that are protected under international human rights standards? | 1.001 6.006 |
| Does the government place restrictions on anonymous online communication or encryption? | 1.001 4.004 |
| Does state surveillance of internet activities infringe on individuals’ right to privacy? | 1.001 6.006 |
| Does monitoring and collection of user data by service providers and other technology companies infringe on individuals’ right to privacy? | 0.000 6.006 |
| Are individuals subject to extralegal intimidation or physical violence by state authorities or any other actor in relation to their online activities? | 1.001 5.005 |
Score Change: The score declined from 2 to 1 because of an uptick in harassment and physical attacks against online journalists.1
- 1“Journalist Hakkı Sağlam physically assaulted in Eskişehir,” Mapping Media Freedom, January 29, 2026, https://www.mapmf.org/alert/34463?f.from=2025-06-01&f.to=2026-05-31&f.c…; “Local publisher Nafiz Koca shot in Elazığ, Turkey,” Committee to Protect Journalists, October 15, 2025, https://cpj.org/2025/10/local-publisher-nafiz-koca-shot-in-elazig-turke….
| Are websites, governmental and private entities, service providers, or individuals subject to widespread hacking and other forms of cyberattack? | 1.001 3.003 |
Country Facts
-
Population
84,980,000 -
Global Freedom Score
32 100 not free -
Internet Freedom Score
31 100 not free -
Freedom in the World Status
Not Free