Abkhazia*
| PR Political Rights | 17 40 |
| CL Civil Liberties | 22 60 |
Freedom in the World reports assess the level of political rights and civil liberties in a given geographical area, regardless of whether they are affected by the state, nonstate actors, or foreign powers. Related, disputed, or occupied territories are sometimes assessed separately if they meet certain criteria, including distinct conditions for political rights and civil liberties and boundaries that are sufficiently stable to allow year-on-year comparisons. For more information, see the report methodology and FAQ.
Abkhazia, a breakaway region of Georgia, has maintained de facto independence since the end of a civil conflict in 1993. The separatist government is financially dependent on Russia, which has a military presence in Abkhazia and is one of a handful of United Nations (UN) member states that recognize the territory’s independence. The tumultuous political environment features significant opposition and civil society activity. Ongoing problems include a flawed criminal justice system, discrimination against ethnic Georgians, and a lack of economic opportunity.
- Throughout the year, Abkhazian lawmakers joined civic groups and protesters in pushing back against Moscow-backed policies that threatened local control and autonomy. In February, the parliament adopted legislation that required the president to submit any international treaty to lawmakers for review before signing it. In April, the parliament refused to pass a government-backed bill that would have imposed heavy penalties for insulting or slandering public officials or spreading “false information.”
- In July, the parliamentary leadership withdrew a controversial bill that would have allowed foreigners—most likely Russians—to build and own thousands of apartments in Abkhazia. The proposal had sparked persistent protests, with political and civil society opponents warning of higher prices and potential demographic changes.
- In September, the Russian government suspended financial support for Abkhazia in an apparent bid to compel adoption of other contentious pro-Russian measures. In late October, the Abkhazian government signed a tentative agreement in Moscow that would have given Russian entities extensive tax subsidies for investment projects in Abkhazia. The deal prompted more mass protests, in which demonstrators forced their way into the parliament and government buildings. The unrest led both President Aslan Bzhania and Prime Minister Aleksandr Ankvab to resign in November, and the parliament voted to reject the investment agreement in December. At year’s end, Vice President Badra Gunba was serving as acting president, and a snap presidential election was expected in early 2025.
- Separately, it was reported in April that Abaza-TV, described as the only independent television channel in Abkhazia, had been purchased by Moscow-based ethnic Abkhaz businessman Zakhar Agrba, raising concerns about its future editorial autonomy. Meanwhile, independent and opposition-oriented channels on the social media platform Telegram continued to provide alternative views and information. In September, a Telegram channel leaked a document suggesting that Russian and Abkhazian authorities were colluding to revoke the Russian citizenship of Abkhazian lawmakers who opposed Kremlin-backed legislation and policies.
This report has been abridged for Freedom in the World 2025 due to ongoing budget constraints. Freedom in the World is entirely funded by nongovernmental sources such as private foundations, corporations, and individuals like you. Please consider making a donation to support future editions of this vital resource.
For additional background information, see last year’s full report.
| Was the current head of government or other chief national authority elected through free and fair elections? | 2.002 4.004 |
| Were the current national legislative representatives elected through free and fair elections? | 2.002 4.004 |
| Are the electoral laws and framework fair, and are they implemented impartially by the relevant election management bodies? | 1.001 4.004 |
| Do the people have the right to organize in different political parties or other competitive political groupings of their choice, and is the system free of undue obstacles to the rise and fall of these competing parties or groupings? | 2.002 4.004 |
| Is there a realistic opportunity for the opposition to increase its support or gain power through elections? | 3.003 4.004 |
| Are the people’s political choices free from domination by forces that are external to the political sphere, or by political forces that employ extrapolitical means? | 2.002 4.004 |
| Do various segments of the population (including ethnic, racial, religious, gender, LGBT+, and other relevant groups) have full political rights and electoral opportunities? | 1.001 4.004 |
| Do the freely elected head of government and national legislative representatives determine the policies of the government? | 1.001 4.004 |
| Are safeguards against official corruption strong and effective? | 1.001 4.004 |
| Does the government operate with openness and transparency? | 2.002 4.004 |
| Are there free and independent media? | 2.002 4.004 |
| Are individuals free to practice and express their religious faith or nonbelief in public and private? | 2.002 4.004 |
| Is there academic freedom, and is the educational system free from extensive political indoctrination? | 1.001 4.004 |
| Are individuals free to express their personal views on political or other sensitive topics without fear of surveillance or retribution? | 3.003 4.004 |
| Is there freedom of assembly? | 3.003 4.004 |
| Is there freedom for nongovernmental organizations, particularly those that are engaged in human rights– and governance-related work? | 1.001 4.004 |
| Is there freedom for trade unions and similar professional or labor organizations? | 1.001 4.004 |
| Is there an independent judiciary? | 1.001 4.004 |
| Does due process prevail in civil and criminal matters? | 1.001 4.004 |
| Is there protection from the illegitimate use of physical force and freedom from war and insurgencies? | 1.001 4.004 |
| Do laws, policies, and practices guarantee equal treatment of various segments of the population? | 1.001 4.004 |
| Do individuals enjoy freedom of movement, including the ability to change their place of residence, employment, or education? | 1.001 4.004 |
| Are individuals able to exercise the right to own property and establish private businesses without undue interference from state or nonstate actors? | 1.001 4.004 |
| Do individuals enjoy personal social freedoms, including choice of marriage partner and size of family, protection from domestic violence, and control over appearance? | 2.002 4.004 |
| Do individuals enjoy equality of opportunity and freedom from economic exploitation? | 1.001 4.004 |
Country Facts
-
Global Freedom Score
39 100 partly free