Cambodia
Cambodia’s political system has been dominated by the Cambodian People’s Party (CPP) and Hun Sen for more than three decades. While the country conducted semicompetitive elections in the past, polls are now held in a severely repressive environment. The CPP-led government has maintained pressure on the opposition, independent press outlets, and demonstrators with intimidation, politically motivated prosecutions, and violence.
Research & Recommendations
Cambodia
| PR Political Rights | 4 40 |
| CL Civil Liberties | 18 60 |
Democratic resilience will increasingly depend on stronger coordination among countries that share a commitment to freedom, the rule of law, and accountable governance.
International support for democratic institutions, civil society, and independent media has been associated with modest but meaningful improvements in democratic governance, and it is far less costly than the military outlays necessitated by rising authoritarian aggression.
Young people are increasingly dissatisfied with democracy—not because they reject its principles, but because they see institutions failing to deliver on them. Programmatic work should create clear pathways for meaningful political participation, from voting and policy engagement to community organizing and public leadership, so that young people can translate their expectations into agency.
Cambodia
| A Obstacles to Access | 14 25 |
| B Limits on Content | 14 35 |
| C Violations of User Rights | 14 40 |
Political Overview
Cambodia’s political system was dominated by the Cambodian People’s Party (CPP) and its leader Hun Sen for more than three decades. In 2023, Hun Sen stepped down as prime minister and facilitated an undemocratic transfer of power to his son, Hun Manet, though Hun Sen effectively retains most political power in the country. While Cambodia held semicompetitive elections in the past, polls are now conducted in a severely repressive environment. The CPP-led government has maintained pressure on the opposition, independent media, and civil society through intimidation, politically motivated prosecutions, and violence.
Freedom of expression online has been and is increasingly under attack as governments shut off internet connectivity, block social media platforms, and restrict access to websites that host political, social, and religious speech. Protecting freedom of expression will require strong legal and regulatory safeguards for digital communications.
Governments should encourage a whole-of-society approach to fostering a high-quality, diverse, and trustworthy information space. The Global Declaration on Information Integrity Online identifies best practices for safeguarding the information ecosystem, to which governments should adhere.
Comprehensive data-protection regulations and industry policies on data protection are essential for upholding privacy and combating disproportionate government surveillance, but they require careful crafting to ensure that they do not contribute to internet fragmentation—the siloing of the global internet into nation-based segments—and cannot be used by governments to undermine privacy and other fundamental freedoms.