STAY UP TO DATE: The Effects of the US Foreign Aid Freeze on Freedom House
Expanding Freedom and Democracy
Freedom on the Net 2025

Ghana

Partly Free
64
100
A Obstacles to Access 15 25
B Limits on Content 28 35
C Violations of User Rights 21 40
Last Year's Score & Status
65 100 Partly Free
Scores are based on a scale of 0 (least free) to 100 (most free). See the methodology and report acknowledgements.
Ghana_hero_map

header1 Key Developments, June 1, 2024 – May 31, 2025

Internet freedom slightly declined during the coverage period. While internet users in Ghana enjoy an information space that is largely free from technical censorship, political actors spread false information on social media ahead of the country’s 2024 elections. Individuals risk arrest for online posts, and a nongovernmental organization experienced cyberattacks.

  • False and misleading information proliferated during the December 2024 general election period.1 Fake “news cards”—graphics used by media outlets to disseminate information under their logo—circulated online under falsified logos. While news houses labeled these as “fake news,” politicians also created and circulated their own “fake news” labels on unfavorable coverage. Journalists and fact-checkers responded by embedding audio of politicians’ statements into their own news cards (B5).2
  • President Nana Akufo-Addo refrained from signing the Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Act into law before his term ended in January 2025. The bill would have criminalized online activities deemed to promote LGBT+ rights and incentivized platforms to censor online content that positively portrayed LGBT+ relationships. Lawmakers introduced a new version of the legislation in February 2025 (B2 and C2).3
  • Arrests for online activities occurred during the coverage period. An opposition activist was arrested in May 2025 and charged with publishing false news in connection with social media posts about Ghana’s chief justice.4 In August 2024, a court sentenced a blogger to one month in prison on charges of spreading false news, in connection with a story containing inaccurate information that led to a bank run. Civil society actors criticized the custodial punishment (C3).5
  • The Media Foundation for West Africa (MFWA) reported that its websites were targeted with cyberattacks in July 2024; they were offline for five weeks. The attacks occurred after MFWA’s Fourth Estate project reported on government appointees’ alleged involvement in illegal mining operations (C8).6

header2 Political Overview

Since 1992, Ghana has held competitive multiparty elections and undergone peaceful transfers of power between the two main political parties, the National Democratic Congress (NDC) and the New Patriotic Party (NPP). Although the country has a relatively strong record of upholding political rights and civil liberties, discrimination against women persists, and LGBT+ people face widespread discrimination, intimidation, and violence. There are some weaknesses in judicial independence, key governance institutions, and the application of the rule of law. Corruption and public service delivery present challenges to government performance. Politically motivated violence remains a concern.

This report has been abridged for Freedom on the Net 2025 due to ongoing budget constraints. Please consider making a donation to support future editions of this vital resource.

For additional background information, see last year’s full report.

A Obstacles to Access

A1 1.00-6.00 pts0-6 pts
Do infrastructural limitations restrict access to the internet or the speed and quality of internet connections? 4.004 6.006

Score Change: The score improved from 3 to 4 because breaks to undersea cables that disrupted mobile service for several days in March 2024 did not recur during the coverage period.

A2 1.00-3.00 pts0-3 pts
Is access to the internet prohibitively expensive or beyond the reach of certain segments of the population for geographical, social, or other reasons? 1.001 3.003
A3 1.00-6.00 pts0-6 pts
Does the government exercise technical or legal control over internet infrastructure for the purposes of restricting connectivity? 5.005 6.006
A4 1.00-6.00 pts0-6 pts
Are there legal, regulatory, or economic obstacles that restrict the diversity of service providers? 4.004 6.006
A5 1.00-4.00 pts0-4 pts
Do national regulatory bodies that oversee service providers and digital technology fail to operate in a free, fair, and independent manner? 1.001 4.004

B Limits on Content

B1 1.00-6.00 pts0-6 pts
Does the state block or filter, or compel service providers to block or filter, internet content, particularly material that is protected by international human rights standards? 6.006 6.006
B2 1.00-4.00 pts0-4 pts
Do state or nonstate actors employ legal, administrative, or other means to force publishers, content hosts, or digital platforms to delete content, particularly material that is protected by international human rights standards? 3.003 4.004
B3 1.00-4.00 pts0-4 pts
Do restrictions on the internet and digital content lack transparency, proportionality to the stated aims, or an independent appeals process? 2.002 4.004
B4 1.00-4.00 pts0-4 pts
Do online journalists, commentators, and ordinary users practice self-censorship? 3.003 4.004
B5 1.00-4.00 pts0-4 pts
Are online sources of information controlled or manipulated by the government or other powerful actors to advance a particular political interest? 2.002 4.004
B6 1.00-3.00 pts0-3 pts
Are there economic or regulatory constraints that negatively affect users’ ability to publish content online? 3.003 3.003
B7 1.00-4.00 pts0-4 pts
Does the online information landscape lack diversity and reliability? 3.003 4.004
B8 1.00-6.00 pts0-6 pts
Do conditions impede users’ ability to mobilize, form communities, and campaign, particularly on political and social issues? 6.006 6.006

C Violations of User Rights

C1 1.00-6.00 pts0-6 pts
Do the constitution or other laws fail to protect rights such as freedom of expression, access to information, and press freedom, including on the internet, and are they enforced by a judiciary that lacks independence? 4.004 6.006
C2 1.00-4.00 pts0-4 pts
Are there laws that assign criminal penalties or civil liability for online activities, particularly those that are protected under international human rights standards? 2.002 4.004
C3 1.00-6.00 pts0-6 pts
Are individuals penalized for online activities, particularly those that are protected under international human rights standards? 3.003 6.006
C4 1.00-4.00 pts0-4 pts
Does the government place restrictions on anonymous communication or encryption? 2.002 4.004
C5 1.00-6.00 pts0-6 pts
Does state surveillance of internet activities infringe on users’ right to privacy? 3.003 6.006
C6 1.00-6.00 pts0-6 pts
Does monitoring and collection of user data by service providers and other technology companies infringe on users’ right to privacy? 3.003 6.006
C7 1.00-5.00 pts0-5 pts
Are individuals subject to extralegal intimidation or physical violence by state authorities or any other actor in relation to their online activities? 3.003 5.005
C8 1.00-3.00 pts0-3 pts
Are websites, governmental and private entities, service providers, or individual users subject to widespread hacking and other forms of cyberattack? 1.001 3.003

Score Change: The score declined from 3 to 1 because the websites of a civil society organization faced cyberattacks after they reported on government appointees’ alleged links to illegal mining.

On Ghana

See all data, scores & information on this country or territory.

See More

Country Facts

  • Population

    33,480,000

  • Global Freedom Score

    80 100 free

  • Internet Freedom Score

    64 100 partly free

  • Freedom in the World Status

    Free

  • Networks Restricted

    No

  • Websites Blocked

    No

  • Pro-government Commentators

    Yes

  • Users Arrested

    Yes