India
| A Obstacles to Access | 16 25 |
| B Limits on Content | 18 35 |
| C Violations of User Rights | 16 40 |
Internet freedom in India declined during the coverage period. The government continues to impose internet shutdowns and censor online content, routinely ordering internet intermediaries to restrict Indian users’ access to posts or websites that the government deems unfavorable.1 Digital mobilization surged in May 2026 under the banner of the Cockroach Janta Party movement, named in response to an offhanded comment from the country’s chief justice; the government censored the movement’s internet presence and cracked down on protests, primarily after the coverage period.2
This report has been abridged for Freedom on the Net 2026. Please consider making a donation to support future editions of this vital resource. For additional information, see the 2024 full report and 2025 abridged report.
- 1Karan Saini, “Poisoned Wells: Examining the scale of DNS censorship in India,” 2026, https://dnsblocks.in/assets/report.pdf; “Content Restrictions: India,” Meta Transparency Center, 2026, https://transparency.meta.com/reports/content-restrictions/country/IN/; “X Corp challenges legality of ‘Sahyog’ portal takedown process before Karnataka HC,” The Hindu, November 17, 2025, https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/karnataka/x-corp-challenges-lega….
- 2“IFF’s Statement on the Blocking of X Account of the Cockroach Janta Party,” Internet Freedom Foundation, May 22, 2026, https://internetfreedom.in/iffs-statement-on-the-blocking-of-x-account-…; Phebyn Joseph, Maggie Paul, and Ruth Gamble, “India’s youth‑led Cockroach party may prove as hard to kill as its namesake,” The Conversation, June 17, 2026, https://theconversation.com/indias-youth-led-cockroach-party-may-prove-….
| Do infrastructural limitations restrict access to the internet or the speed and quality of internet connections? | 4.004 6.006 |
| Is access to the internet prohibitively expensive or beyond the reach of certain segments of the population for geographical, social, or other reasons? | 2.002 3.003 |
| Does the government exercise technical or legal control over internet infrastructure for the purposes of restricting connectivity? | 4.004 6.006 |
Score Change: The score improved from 3 to 4 because internet shutdowns imposed by Indian authorities were less severe than during previous coverage periods, though short-term and localized shutdowns remained common during protests and unrest.1
- 1Internet Shutdowns Tracker, SFLC.in, accessed October 1, 2026, https://internetshutdowns.in/; Internet Shutdowns, All Tracked Shutdowns, Internet Society, accessed October 1, 2026, https://pulse.internetsociety.org/en/shutdowns/?country_code=IN#shutdow….
| Are there legal, regulatory, or economic obstacles that restrict the diversity of service providers? | 4.004 6.006 |
| Do national regulatory bodies that oversee service providers, digital platforms, and the internet more broadly fail to operate in a free, fair, and independent manner? | 2.002 4.004 |
| Does the state block or filter, or compel service providers to block or filter, internet content, particularly material that is protected by international human rights standards? | 3.003 6.006 |
| Do state or nonstate actors employ legal, administrative, or other means to force publishers, digital platforms, content hosts, or other intermediaries to delete content, particularly material that is protected by international human rights standards? | 1.001 4.004 |
| Do restrictions on the internet and digital content lack transparency, proportionality to the stated aims, or an independent appeals process? | 1.001 4.004 |
Score Change: The score declined from 2 to 1 because of steady effort to expand India’s legal framework for online censorship, including February 2026 amendments to the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules that reduced the timeframe for companies to remove notified content from 36 hours to 3 hours,1 raising significant concerns about overbroad removal orders.2
- 1Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology Notification, February 10, 2026, https://drive.google.com/file/d/1p0zkFFA92qRmaC7GeEKLFlkj0YKdSIOX/.
- 2Apar Gupta and Nikhil Pawa, “New digital rules risk diluting Supreme Court safeguards,” Times of India, April 5, 2026, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/sunday-times/all-that-matters/….
| Do journalists, commentators, and ordinary people practice self-censorship online? | 3.003 4.004 |
| Are online sources of information controlled or manipulated by the government or other powerful actors to advance a favored interest? | 1.001 4.004 |
| Are there economic, regulatory, or other constraints that negatively affect individuals’ ability to publish content online? | 2.002 3.003 |
| Does the online information landscape lack diversity and reliability? | 3.003 4.004 |
| Do conditions impede individuals’ ability to form communities, mobilize, and campaign online, particularly on political and social issues? | 4.004 6.006 |
| Do the constitution or other laws fail to protect rights such as freedom of expression, access to information, and press freedom, including on the internet, and are they enforced by a judiciary that lacks independence? | 4.004 6.006 |
| Are there laws that assign criminal penalties or civil liability for online activities, particularly those that are protected under international human rights standards? | 2.002 4.004 |
| Are individuals penalized for online activities, particularly those that are protected under international human rights standards? | 2.002 6.006 |
Score Change: The score declined from 3 to 2 because journalists were sentenced to prison for their online posts,1 alongside routine arrests and short-term detentions of internet users for their online commentary on political, social, and religious topics.2
- 1“Journalist Ravi Nair convicted in Adani defamation case, sentenced to one-year imprisonment,” Scroll.in, February 11, 2026, https://scroll.in/latest/1090641/journalist-ravi-nair-convicted-in-adan….
- 2See, e.g., “BRS activist Nalla Balu arrested again for retweeting a social media post, after court granted him bail,” Telangana Today, July 17, 2025, https://telanganatoday.com/brs-activist-nalla-balu-arrested-again-for-r…; Salil Tiwari, “Freedom Of Speech Doesn’t Extend To Insulting The Prime Minister: Allahabad High Court,” LawBeat, July 3, 2025, https://www.news18.com/india/freedom-of-speech-doesnt-extend-to-insulti…; Naina J A, “Man who posted hate post in 2024 arrested at Mumbai airport by Mangaluru police,” Deccan Herald, December 8, 2025, https://www.deccanherald.com/india/karnataka/mangaluru/man-who-posted-h….
| Does the government place restrictions on anonymous online communication or encryption? | 2.002 4.004 |
| Does state surveillance of internet activities infringe on individuals’ right to privacy? | 1.001 6.006 |
| Does monitoring and collection of user data by service providers and other technology companies infringe on individuals’ right to privacy? | 2.002 6.006 |
| Are individuals subject to extralegal intimidation or physical violence by state authorities or any other actor in relation to their online activities? | 1.001 5.005 |
| Are websites, governmental and private entities, service providers, or individuals subject to widespread hacking and other forms of cyberattack? | 2.002 3.003 |
Country Facts
-
Population
1,417,170,000 -
Global Freedom Score
62 100 partly free -
Internet Freedom Score
50 100 partly free -
Freedom in the World Status
Partly Free