STAY UP TO DATE: The Effects of the US Foreign Aid Freeze on Freedom House
Expanding Freedom and Democracy
Freedom on the Net 2025

Zimbabwe

Partly Free
50
100
A Obstacles to Access 10 25
B Limits on Content 22 35
C Violations of User Rights 18 40
Last Year's Score & Status
48 100 Partly Free
Scores are based on a scale of 0 (least free) to 100 (most free). See the methodology and report acknowledgements.
Zimbabwe_hero_map

header1 Key Developments, June 1, 2024 – May 31, 2025

Internet freedom in Zimbabwe improved slightly during the coverage period. While the penetration rate for mobile service increased, internet access continued to be hampered by infrastructure constraints, frequent electricity shortages, and high prices. Authorities persisted in their crackdown on expressions of political dissent online, and both journalists and ordinary users faced arrests, threats, and harassment for their online activity, particularly when they criticized the government.

  • Although internet access remained prohibitively expensive for many Zimbabweans, US-based Starlink’s satellite internet service, which became available in Zimbabwe in September 2024, offered more affordable pricing options than other internet service providers (ISPs).1 Starlink terminals sold out shortly after becoming available,2 and the company’s entry into the market forced other ISPs to reduce their prices in order to compete (A2 and A4).3
  • Amendments to the Broadcasting Services Act that were promulgated in May 2025 expanded the scope of the law to include digital media platforms and internet-based broadcasting services such as podcasts.4 The amendments also strengthened the president’s control over the Broadcasting Authority Board by removing a provision that had allowed for parliamentary consultation on the president’s board appointments (B6).
  • Several activists and journalists were arrested and detained for their online content as part of an ongoing crackdown on media freedom in Zimbabwe. In February 2025, Blessed Mhlanga, a journalist for the YouTube-based outlet Heart and Soul TV, was arrested and charged with inciting violence; the case centered on an interview in which a war veteran and former member of the ruling party called for President Emmerson Mnangagwa’s resignation.5 After being held for nearly three months, Mhlanga was granted provisional release, though he was still awaiting trial at the end of the coverage period. He faced up to three years in prison if convicted (C3).

header2 Political Overview

The Zimbabwe African National Union–Patriotic Front (ZANU-PF) has dominated Zimbabwean politics since independence in 1980 by carrying out severe crackdowns on the political opposition, critical media, and all sources of dissent. President Emmerson Mnangagwa took power in 2017 after the military intervened to remove longtime President Robert Mugabe amid factional divisions within the ruling party. Mnangagwa has largely retained the legal, administrative, and security architecture of the Mugabe era, and has consolidated his authority through acts of repression and a number of constitutional amendments. Endemic corruption, a vast patronage system, weak rule of law, and poor protections for workers and land rights remain critical challenges.

This report has been abridged for Freedom on the Net 2025 due to ongoing budget constraints. Please consider making a donation to support future editions of this vital resource.

For additional background information, see last year’s full report.

A Obstacles to Access

A1 1.00-6.00 pts0-6 pts
Do infrastructural limitations restrict access to the internet or the speed and quality of internet connections? 2.002 6.006

Score Change: The score improved from 1 to 2 due to increased mobile-service penetration,1 though electricity rationing and frequent power outages continued to disrupt people’s access to the internet.2

A2 1.00-3.00 pts0-3 pts
Is access to the internet prohibitively expensive or beyond the reach of certain segments of the population for geographical, social, or other reasons? 0.000 3.003
A3 1.00-6.00 pts0-6 pts
Does the government exercise technical or legal control over internet infrastructure for the purposes of restricting connectivity? 5.005 6.006
A4 1.00-6.00 pts0-6 pts
Are there legal, regulatory, or economic obstacles that restrict the diversity of service providers? 3.003 6.006
A5 1.00-4.00 pts0-4 pts
Do national regulatory bodies that oversee service providers and digital technology fail to operate in a free, fair, and independent manner? 0.000 4.004

B Limits on Content

B1 1.00-6.00 pts0-6 pts
Does the state block or filter, or compel service providers to block or filter, internet content, particularly material that is protected by international human rights standards? 6.006 6.006
B2 1.00-4.00 pts0-4 pts
Do state or nonstate actors employ legal, administrative, or other means to force publishers, content hosts, or digital platforms to delete content, particularly material that is protected by international human rights standards? 3.003 4.004
B3 1.00-4.00 pts0-4 pts
Do restrictions on the internet and digital content lack transparency, proportionality to the stated aims, or an independent appeals process? 2.002 4.004
B4 1.00-4.00 pts0-4 pts
Do online journalists, commentators, and ordinary users practice self-censorship? 2.002 4.004
B5 1.00-4.00 pts0-4 pts
Are online sources of information controlled or manipulated by the government or other powerful actors to advance a particular political interest? 2.002 4.004

Score Change: The score improved from 1 to 2 because the content manipulation observed during the August 2023 electoral cycle was not repeated during the coverage period.

B6 1.00-3.00 pts0-3 pts
Are there economic or regulatory constraints that negatively affect users’ ability to publish content online? 1.001 3.003
B7 1.00-4.00 pts0-4 pts
Does the online information landscape lack diversity and reliability? 3.003 4.004
B8 1.00-6.00 pts0-6 pts
Do conditions impede users’ ability to mobilize, form communities, and campaign, particularly on political and social issues? 3.003 6.006

C Violations of User Rights

C1 1.00-6.00 pts0-6 pts
Do the constitution or other laws fail to protect rights such as freedom of expression, access to information, and press freedom, including on the internet, and are they enforced by a judiciary that lacks independence? 2.002 6.006
C2 1.00-4.00 pts0-4 pts
Are there laws that assign criminal penalties or civil liability for online activities, particularly those that are protected under international human rights standards? 1.001 4.004
C3 1.00-6.00 pts0-6 pts
Are individuals penalized for online activities, particularly those that are protected under international human rights standards? 3.003 6.006
C4 1.00-4.00 pts0-4 pts
Does the government place restrictions on anonymous communication or encryption? 3.003 4.004
C5 1.00-6.00 pts0-6 pts
Does state surveillance of internet activities infringe on users’ right to privacy? 2.002 6.006
C6 1.00-6.00 pts0-6 pts
Does monitoring and collection of user data by service providers and other technology companies infringe on users’ right to privacy? 2.002 6.006
C7 1.00-5.00 pts0-5 pts
Are individuals subject to extralegal intimidation or physical violence by state authorities or any other actor in relation to their online activities? 3.003 5.005
C8 1.00-3.00 pts0-3 pts
Are websites, governmental and private entities, service providers, or individual users subject to widespread hacking and other forms of cyberattack? 2.002 3.003

On Zimbabwe

See all data, scores & information on this country or territory.

See More

Country Facts

  • Population

    16,320,000

  • Global Freedom Score

    26 100 not free

  • Internet Freedom Score

    50 100 partly free

  • Freedom in the World Status

    Not Free

  • Networks Restricted

    No

  • Websites Blocked

    No

  • Pro-government Commentators

    Yes

  • Users Arrested

    Yes